If only it was so simple, Instinct has developed over hundreds of thousands of years, it's main purpose is to protect humans and animals to preform simple behaviours or even intricate ones without having to learn them or understand how it works, in the same way a bird can fly without having to practice or animals know what to do when the mate or forage for food, this is instinct, saying it's instinct to like or dislike a person you do not know based on clips and selected editing is not very logical, from all the information you have you should be aware that it does not represent a real person at all, I'm sure you have heard about people who one day meet a celebrity or famous person only to be deeply disappointed, you could firmly say you did not like a person based on your instinct once you actual meet them, there is so much more information that your senses can absorb, anybody that has experienced internet dating will understand this logic, some people that sound fantastic on paper and print will make your skin crawl, others you would not give a second look turn out to be very likeable and great people. Judge a person based on what they can do or did, not on what they claim they can do, hence the hatred for Politicians and boxers who blow their own trumpets and do so very little, a young man can not claim to have done any great things, this takes time, lets wait and see what these young men can do. I felt bad for ***an because he is a decent hearty boxer, a few years ago he would have made a better showing of himself but no boxer goes into the ring the same person fight after fight, this was not a good fair fight IMHO and Amir needs to fight higher level opponets to get any respect, we all know this and nobody disagrees, but why make it personal when its so impersonal and remote from all of us.
**** that usually my gut instinct is right, as soon as i meet someone within 5 seconds i know if i like or dislike them, 95% of the time my first instinct is right
I agree......Instinct has nothing to do with "learning" It comes natural. Its a natural instinct wether you like or dislike someone. Its natural wether you get on with someone as a mate or dont get on. Its nothing to do with logic. Logically everything may seem fine..............but your instinct may still be to dislike them. Like Lewis Hamilton says and does all the text book right things.......he is polite........media friendly...........and successful...........a typical nice young lad done very well................and always flashes that million dollar colgate toothpaste smile Logically.........everyone should like him However one guy said on ESB before...........there is something about Hamilton...........a certain vibe about him........he senses he looks down on others...........a bit of a **** Thats the feeling he gets........he dislikes him............thats instinct I go with my instincts always.........while try to force yourself to like someone when all your instincts are telling you that you dislike him Also I disagee..............you do get a impression of a person off the TV They are not ****ing cardboard cut outs on the TV mind They are the real person..........a human being I agree..........there would be alot more information to sense if you were to meet them in person But you can still get a real impression of them off the TV..........as guess what that really ****ing is them mind............not some cartoon character :nut
Think of the popular lad in school Everyones his mate................its good to know him TOP MAN Popular But you know inside really he is a ****
I dont like Tony Blair............depsite the polite manners...........and toothy grin I think he is a ****ing weak *****.............and a giant lizard who drinks human blood The queen too..........kills babies and worships Satan I dont like them
You just said it, when you meet them, the other side of the coin is in what circumstance you meet them, if it's in a night club and he is looking at your bird then you will probably not like the chap, if you burning to death in a car and he drags you butt out you will feel very differently about the very same person. I'm sure you guys know what what is called photogenic or videogenics, some people come across very well on film video and pictures and others don't, some models come across fantastically well on pictures but in video they are just horrible, super models being the best example, some people come across very well on Radio but again in real life they bomb, when a human is in a view finder of a camera that is broadcasting live to Millions of people they take on another persona, this is not really them, it's an Altar or altenative personallity, even TV news casters and presenters have the ability to switch it on, these people are screen tested for these unmeasureable qualities, the ability to be a certain person infront of a camera is a skill, this is why actors spend years learning the craft of lying on screen, like I said before what we see it not actual a human person, in the same way a picture of a sun set will not make you feel the same as the actual sun set,, the people we watch and see on TV are full of illusion and trickery, we are conditioned to see them as normal when they are so not. TV is the biggest brain **** I could ever discribe.
This has all become very intellectual, and does not need to be. Lets just all agree that Khan needs to fight higher level opponents, and cut down on the arrogance like he is some big shot pro boxer, because he is not. He is an amateur boxer, who is unproven even at domestic level in the pro ranks. The dislike for Khan comes from the hype without anything to back it up with...Do I hear you say timber...that chin is so fragile...
Nothing is intellectual as such, just well understood. On this nobody disagrees and this is the only way any boxer gets respect.
Flint was slightly deranged, I'd read other posts he'd made like that, all manner of weirdys on the web....