Sorry Bokaj, i meant to say he had lost some speed by the third bout, not rematch. and then after the rubber he went downhill quickly.
What LW would you favor over him h2h? This is where Duran thrives and is the main reason he is held in such high regard historically.
I wouldn't discount Ken Buchanan in 1973 or 1974, He was 'miles' better than Masataka Takayama who lasted less than 1-Round in December 1974. It was clearly a desired bout by the boxing world. Ken was ranked as the #2 Lightweight in 1973, and #3 in 1974. Not sure what 'Planet' Masataka Takayama was on that ranked him in the Top 10.
Duran was beating Buchanon in one sided fashion but the ending wasnt the way you want to settle something. Buchanon won about 13 fights in a row after that and he probably deserved a shot.
I don't see anyone with the exception of Benny & Gans who could rate higher than him at LW. I rate Leonard 1 and go back and forth between Duran & Gans for the 2 spot. Just about everyone rates him in the top 3, so that rating seems fair. I guess if you find him to be outside of the 3 greatest Lightweights, than you could say he was over rated....but more likely rating him outside of the top 3 is under rating. I would say he is rated right where he should be!
Mosley. Yeah, I'm going there. He'd **** everyone at 135 that Duran fought, I'm superbly confident in that.
And Williams. The other two are above, I agree, but not by very much at all. It's about the same gap that separates Sanchez and Pep. Williams, to me at least, looks extremely good on film. Saying that, Ortiz has to be on the same level as Williams as well.
It is unfortunate,,,,,, But Roberto may have been one great Light-Welterweight Champion, as the opportunity was there for the taking.
Fascinating. Didn't you post another article circa 1977-78 in which Carlos Zarate was considered the best fighter 'P4P' at the time?