is jake lamotta overated or underrated?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by shommel, Feb 22, 2011.

  1. BronxBull

    BronxBull New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    in 100 fights he was never counted out.one of the best body punchers/infighters of all time. first person ever to beat sugar ray when he was in his prime, no one else has that claim. i think that must count for something.
     
  2. Raging B(_)LL

    Raging B(_)LL KAPOW!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,675
    Likes Received:
    47

    It depends who you ask really, imo he is a bit of both, but overall I`d say he is underrated.
     
  3. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    4,915
    Likes Received:
    151
    I think LaMotta is a great fighter, you can see it in his movement, obviously durable as hell, tough as teak and cement head for sure, some great wins,

    but like Power Punch said a lot of WWs cum MWs and yet Jake struggled with MW weight limits, he was the natural bigger man. I have pointed this out often and the french Villimain is the best example of that...

    Steele, McAvoy, Apostili, Zale, Cerdan rematch and more yet I think could have bettered him more often than not.

    his film has elevated his status, but a great fighter none the less.
     
  4. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    18,285
    Likes Received:
    411
    S, just about my feelings about LaMotta.He started out with the toughies.
    Just think ,in his first eighteen months as a fighter,LaMotta had THIRTY TWO
    bouts with the likes of Jimmy Reeves, Jimmy Edgar, Nate Bolden,Jose Basora, Vic Dellicurti, and some tomato can named Ray Robinson. Remarkable,I think
    to start a career. No one was tougher ! Better ,yes, but none tougher ...