Are you being effing serious? Like for real, are you? Froch's resume obliterates Taylor's! Let's be honest about Josh, he's beaten two good fighters: Regis and Ramirez. Really though, only Regis. Ramirez is limited as all Hell. Compare that to wins over: Pascal, Taylor, Dirrell, Abraham, Kessler, Johnson, Bute, and Groves. Froch has two losses: One to an all time great, and the other to an excellent fighter in Kessler. He never got schooled by a domestic level fighter like Catterall. Joke of a question to ask. Yes genius, Froch's accomplishments are greater than Taylor's.
I don't think so. He'd make a British hof if such a thing existed, first fighter from these shores to hold 4 belts since the wbo became accepted, but he needed to follow that up to cement a place. As it is I think good but not great...
Noticed Bradley wasn't on commentary duty for Teo's fight, was that because he called Teo Dogfood for all at 140? Or was he removed per request from Lopez's team? Ward was also trying his best to come off as more balanced for a change & approving Teo's obvious shots more, must of been trying to cover up for years of one sided way of commentary lol.
I'm gonna have a mini-stroke reading comments around here. The lack of knowledge is downright f***cking startling. Bradley wasn't in attendance because it was induction weekend at the HOF, genius. Even if you didn't KNOW that (which as a boxing fan, you kinda should) it was mentioned several times on the telecast. Moreover, Lopez's team doesn't have the power to request Bradley's removal. He's under contract with ESPN, not Teofimo Lopez. It'd be a cold day in Hell when a fighter who's a NON-superstar gets to say to a network, "This guy gives me constructive criticism. I don't want him calling my fights."
Okay well that's why I asked the question, Lack of knowing Bradley's whereabouts all the time is so startling to the point it's got you getting ready for a mini stroke, damn, It ain't they serious or even important, if anything you would think correcting your grammar would be the tipping point for your sanity genius.
You started your second sentence by ending your first sentence with a comma... I BEG you to try to go after my grammar.
Glad you went back & corrected it, why are you highlighting words in capital,unlike you i know how to read.
For emphasis. It's not a grammatical error. Posing the question of why I would do something without ending said question in a question mark, however, is a grammatical error. As you were.
Perhaps you need "a" word to be glaringly highlighted in order for you not to miss it's importance considering how your brain functions, you should keep that indication for yourself ONLY going forward.
"Its" importance. Not "it's (it is)" importance lol. Attempting to attack me on grammar (and getting schooled in that as well) is the classic sign of someone who wants to direct away from the argument itself.
Oh thanks for correcting that be it 30mins too late, I could tell you really had to work hard for that one got you feeling all giddy, Oh did you feel Attacked now?Guess being a Bradley apologetic or is it Ward fanboy that's got you so upset, I could see how sensitive types like yourself would think this was an actual attack haha, Talk about being a dumbcunt with you quoting my post directed for another & thinking you're all that with that weak ass rebuttal.
I dislike Bradley AND Ward. If you knew my posting history you'd know that. But nothing they've said about Teo has been biased. They, like most other boxing fans, just get pissed about the fact that this kid blows hot and cold, and struggles with/loses to fighters he shouldn't. It's called offering constructive criticism. Teo doesn't want that. Teo wants to live in a safe bubble filled with yes men and nuthuggers like yourself.