Is Spence the best WW now ?

In order to be the best, you have to beat the best. Spence hasn't done that.

 

Since the best no longer fight each other these days, Errol is up for debate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

same here. I like Sammy Vasquez too.

 

Then it's just talk because it's not based in fact. It remains, if haven't beaten the best, then you can't be declared the best. It has to be proven.

 

He has to proove that first.

 

I honestly can't see Spence hanging around at WW for too long.

He'll roll thru the Haymon stable, then into a PPV against Brook once Brook wins a LMW title.

Spence has the size and frame to fight at MW right now, coming into the ring near 165.

Add 10lbs of lean muscle to him and he'd be blowing out Jacobs, Quillin, Lara and the rest of Haymons MWs faster than he did Algeri.

Off ALL the fighters below 175, only Spence, Lubin, and possibly Andrade(if he gets his shiit together again) have a LEGIT chance at beating GGG, especially if he hangs at 160 til he retires.

 

Spence should fight the winner of Thurman-Brook.

 

I want to see what happens to Spence when he gets tagged by a WW who can punch. Nobody has any idea what kind of chin he has and it wont get tested until he gets in there with a guy who can crack.

 

No kell Brook is.

 

He may be a better boxer but he doesn't have the victories to really press that point yet. If we are going by record instead of the eye test he's got a ways to go.

Best victories
Tim Bradley: Pacquiao, Marquez, Provodnikov, Vargas
Danny Garcia: Khan, Guerrero, Malignaggi
Kell Brook: Porter
Keith Thurman: Guerrero, Chaves
Errol Spence: Algieri
Khan: Algieri

 

Unless you're ggg. I might as well crown Spence Jr. right now for some balance around here.

 

vccigoofdxzxzxtyuj

 

I'm glad somebody spoke sense. How can errol spence be the best welterweight :S he has 2 noteable wins on his resume, both are very average fighters and neither can punch...