Is this why Floyd took the fight with Shane?

Floyd + vacation = chicken duck ???

 

So just because someone isn't peak it means that they aren't good now.

 

everyone got suckered, shane had no chance under those circumstances

 

I'm just saying some pbf fans celebrate as if they beat

Mosley as if he's in his peak. They celebrate and claim they made JMM look amature compared to PAC's performance against JMM completely forgetting that FMJ fought the ULTRA BLOATED jmm:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

No, you just said it's a weak division with Shane being number 1.

 

This is why Mayweather don't care about public opinion, he gonna get bashed no matter who he fights regardless.

Kosta Tzyu was inactive for 22months fought Shamba Mitchell then fought Hatton 7 months later. Tzyu had a warm up fight before Hatton and knocked Mitchell down 4times and looked good.

Mosley was training to fight Berto and the fight got cancelled at the last second then went on to fight Mayweather. First people were using the excuse Mosley over trained. Now the excuse is he was inactive. I don't know how inactive you can be when you are training and sparring on a consistent basis.

Mayweather retired for 21months then fought Marquez and then fought Mosley 8 months later. Mayweather had the same pattern as Tszyu who you are using as an example of inactivity.

Mayweather had one fight in 3yrs by the time he face Mosley. Mosley had 2 fight in 3yrs by the time he face Mayweather. As well as training to fight Berto while Mayweather was negotiating to fight Pac.

 

I doubt you suddenly stumbled over that post in 3mins, considering how long ago it was.

I suspect you had a long, anti-climactic afternoon trawling through my posting history, only to come up with that failure. You should get a job, or a girlfriend.


And I quite clearly haven't said Floyd cherrypicked him at all, I have posted something Floyd said, and asked if people think this belief is what prompted Floyd to fight Shane now, and not at any other point in the last 5 years. I asked a question. :good

 

Please. Don't impose your own playground mentality on others.

 

So you give FULL credit for beating grand Papa Mosley at 38 yrs old?! :rofl

YES or NO?!

and having a 38 yr old boxer as the # 1 ww is a STRONG DIVISION atsch?!

YES or NO

Mosley was a great boxer but he is the SHADOW of his old self. I'll give FMJ credit if he beat the Prime or younger Mosley but I like said. Some FMJ fans are celebrating or insinuating that they beat the BEST of Molsey.

Come to think of it. I'm not surprised coz they also celebrated the victory of JMM as if JMM was at his best at 147lbs :!::!::!:

 

Uh what about Pac fighting DLH at 147 coz Roach knew DLH couldnt pull the trigger and he would be drained? How bout Roach claiming Cotto would be damaged goods?

 

Being that you're a PAc fan who always thinks that Floyd is doing something cowardly, who gives a **** what YOU and the rest of the ******* nation thinks or agrees with lol...

 

How about {Torrecampo}--[Singsurat]+(Morales)=3 losses, 2 by ko in 3 rounds

 

there's a big difference between a 38 and a 32 yrd old

 

Agenda pushing hate in this thread.

Floyd had fought once in 2 and a half years before he fought Mosley. Mosley was one of the best welterweights in the world at the time and nothing is going to change that. People always said ''He won't fight a top welterweight''. You should have excluded Mosley from that list if you were never going to give him credit in the first place. Mosley should have stayed active instead of doing nothing if a lay off was going to affect him, which it didn't by the way, he just got thoroughly outboxed.

 

Why is this bad thread still chugging along?