Please Dan lol, stop doing lieing to yourself. Its not good for you honestly. Even if its on a forum. Immature. Lets get real. You said... Now (lol that word, should I define it?) we were clearly discussing these times. It says right there in your post not that we need to put that into context as we both know we were discussing the here and now. Youre constant evolving deflections brought about a "clutching at straws" effort in desperately grabbing any source even if it meant an irrelevant 2015 article to support Wilders interest in Parkers offer several days ago (thats sounds stupid but its what you done). Key words you used was NOW and Parker. You have not provided any source to back that up. No Wilder recently expressing any interest in Parker. I checked myself to HELP YOU and I couldnt find nothing. Why? Cos its crap, you sometimes post crap and make it out thats its word. Wilder hasnt yet expressed any interest in Joseph Parkers latest offer. You didnt need to say that. You didnt have to lie.
How exactly is fighting one top ten boxer in 37 bouts helping him with this alleged goal of unifying the belts?
Wilders vision is great, his knockouts are great but his actions dont instantly align with his vision. I dont fully understand why and maybe he has good reasons but hes the one that said 'this way' and so far the path seems crooked. Damn, one top ten boxer in 37 fights! All respect to Wilders 37 victories, I think thats great but one top ten fighter? Interesting.
Lol.. What exactly am I lying to myself about? First, you claimed that Klitty/Joshua wasn't for the vacant WBA belt, then you wanted proof of Wilder being interested in Parker. Direct quote... Wow thats clearly not what I asked for. If you look at my post in response to yours, it clearly asks if you could provide a link to prove that Wilders interested in a match up with Parker. You were wrong on both parts and still grasping at straws. Now it's about wanting to find a recent quote from Wilder despite Parker and his team making the offer 5 days ago while Wilder is out injured for the holidays. LMFAO. Wilder and his team expressed interest in Parker since August of 2015. Parker and his team didn't want it then and claimed they weren't ready. Wilder claims that he wants to unify the HW division in 2017. It's December 2016 and Parker has just won the belt. Now again, what does that tell you? Hoping for a legitimate response, most likely will get another strawman argument though.
It's simple really. Wilder just won the WBC belt in 2015 against the reigning champ Stiverne in a fight nobody picked him to win. In 2015, Wladimir Klitschko held the other 3 belts until losing it to Fury later that year. After that, the belts became hostage for a year while Wilder tried to make a fight against his mandatory Pedvetkin(a top 5 HW). Pedvetkin wasted Wilder's and everyone time by failing a drug test, so Wilder fought another tune up in Arreola and injured his hand for the rest of the year. Now, in the upcoming year of 2017, Wilder has expressed great interest in unifying the belts, wanting the other champs in Joshua and Fury(until Fury got stripped).
Aren't you the guy claiming that Pedvetkin failed a drug test due to obscure conspiracy theories involving 'Murica? No wonder this guy is mad.
No I did not claim it WASNT for the WBA. I simply said it was vacant which it is. I bring proof to further make you look stupid. Read and weep lol. Next, lets look at our first two traded posts to reiterate just exactly what we are talking about here. To say the very least, you made a statement, I asked for a source for your statement. Lets NOT hide the context of these traded posts. They are all in relation to your claims of Wilders interest in Parkers current offer to which I asked for proof. After awhile all you could come up with was 2015 article and attatched yourself to that. The two traded posts are clearly in relation to the current unification opportunity. To think we were talking about something else would be dense. You know what were talking about, you just unhappy you got exposed and thats just something Ive just found out about you but from what I hear...everyone else knows.
Aren't you the idiot that's claiming Wilder should be mentioned with the likes of great past heavyweights while CONVENIENTLY leaving out certain ones?? Lol Most on here don't take your posts serious. And it's funny... I see the same celebration type attitude from certain posters on here as I did the first test Povetkin was popped for (Which was dismissed) and It's obvious why Chicken legged Wilder gets that glass chin saved once again! Lol! Wilder still has nightmares about the first Russian that cracked him out.
Can you guys give it a rest please? He said/ she said.... Blah, blah. Enough already. Wilder may well fight Parker but more likely he will wait for a huge payday against (he hopes) Joshua. If Klit beats Joshua, look for Wilder to train his sights on Parker. Most likely scenario.
Yeah I didnt mean to flood the thread. We got carried away Yeah it defintely looks that way. As DirtyDan has mentioned - Joshua/Wlads clash for the two belts seems to have Wilder hooked. Interesting you feel Wilder is more interested in Joshua than Wlad and that he does have that option of Parker. Just saw the news: Parkers in Samoa and it looks like Fury maybe next for Parker.
Jew tribes extend all around the world, some of the original tribes derive from northern Africa, however, I certainly know of the purifying activities that go on with other communities. I always find the two theories interesting....one group of folks believe in maintaining characteristics and genetic dispositions while scientists today look at communities like say Brazilians who have a profound mixture and the link to healthier, stronger adaptive humans. Its way to early to truly know anything as fact since we are still a relatively young species. I appreciate the info....always good reading new perspectives, thoughts and experiences.