Is Wlad just a Bute without a Froch to fight?

Byrd, Peter, Ibragimov, Haye, Chagaev would be considered elite competition by me. All beltholders at one point. Former champions.

 

Ok

 

When outright hatred has choked on itself, brittards picked up an absurd association game.
The circus goes on.

 

They aint Elite. The won the belts from fighters who were even lower down the pecking order than they were.

 

It's not Wlad's fault. His legacy shouldn't be undermined by the fact that his opposition simply up to it. It's kind of like Mike Tyson from 1985-1989. He mowed through everyone.

Wlad simply doesn't have a Lennox, Tyson, Holyfield, Foreman, Bowe, Tua et al type of challenger. His biggest challenger (mythically speaking) was a guy who he dwarfed by 4" and outweighed by 40lbs and who was naturally 2 weight divisions smaller than him in reality.

Wlad is a super HW. His opponents for the most part are heavyweights,. His biggest challenge came from a blown up cruiserweight in Haye.

The other contrast to Tyson is that Wlad enjoys massive physical advantages over his opponents while Tyson was usually 2-6" shorter, lighter and had to rely on speed and timing rather than brute force. For that reason alone, I rank Tyson significantly higher than the Klitschko brothers.

For the record - Head to Head, I think a 1988 Tyson demolishes Wladimir.

 

It anit personal. The writting is on the wall and people are calling it. Know the difference, poindexter.

 

Chris Byrd is a better fighter than Haye.

 

Well so what would a contender have to do to be considered elite?

 

Haye >>>>>> Bute.

Edit: Also...

Wlad >>>>>> Froch

No disrespect to either Bute or Froch.

 

Haters are desperate for any little angle to dimish Wlad's 13 straight title defences and two previous title holds. Sad really.

 

Bute never beat anyone good

Wlad has longetevity

 

Comparing Wlad to Bute is just pretty stupid.....End thread please.

 

I've got another question, would Wlad be **** if he wasn't so good :think