Its confirmed HATTON IS A P****

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by scurlaruntings, Jan 21, 2008.


  1. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    they're all in on it now!!! Nothing like a good Hatton thread to get the haters going.
     
  2. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    And Witter has done what exactly to establish himself as one of the best? A win over a ridiculously unfocused and/or past it Harris? Or a really close win over Kotelnik - which you could easily argue should be a draw.

    People would be saying **** all if M'Baye beats Rees and ended up fighting Hatton. But Rees pulled off the upset (and easily) and, as pathetic as it is, probably has the most impressive single victory of all the top contenders.
     
  3. Strike

    Strike Boxing Addict banned

    3,982
    0
    Sep 14, 2004
    What a pathetic post. He is a "fraud" only in your Hollywood idea of what a champion is. I did and do have an issue with how slowly his career was brought along, but you are a joke when it comes to him. Lets look at your past comments...

    - Tackie will KO him within 5 he is a fraud and has never faced someone as good as Tackie.

    After the Tackie fight a few weeks of respect and then "Tackie was old and no way near good enough, a journeyman, Hatton is a coward and a fraud who will never fight top level opponents.

    - Tyszu fight is announced, and you say "Hatton gets destroyed within the first 2 or 3 rounds. At last we get to see this hype job exposed, Tsyzu is the man so fair play for him taking it but he will be ruined.

    After the fight, respect for a couple of months and then "Tsyzu was an old man, semi retired, past it, Hatton will never fight a fighter in their prime.

    - Months of mocking how Hatton would never ever take on PBF, then the fight is announced and Hatton is going to the US to have the bout.

    He is now ridiculed for losing to one of the greatest fighters that has ever put on a pair of gloves and is called a "pu*sy" and a "fraud".:roll::roll:

    Before fighting PBF you provided a list of opponents that you said would be acceptable fights and worthy opponents, these included Malignaggi, Torres, Hopkins and Diaz.
    Now if any one of those fights were signed, you would say he was a ***** and a disgrace and yet two months ago they were worthy opponents.
     
  4. bizzer07

    bizzer07 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,246
    1
    Dec 11, 2007
    yep totally agree, well put
     
  5. Betty Swollocks

    Betty Swollocks James 'Lights Out' Toney Full Member

    5,709
    1
    Jul 21, 2004
    you must be kidding.

    Witter has beat 4 top 10 140lb fighters in the last 2-3 years. More than Paulie or anyone else I can think of. Did Wicky even beat that many top 10 guys? He just fought a bunch of turkeys and old men before he fought semi-retired Tszyu with everything in his favour.
     
  6. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    why, he'd just be accused of fighting someones left overs again? and judah isn't fighting down at 140 anymore.

    :lol:

    witter would go the distance with floyd because unlike hatton he doesn't lead with his head, he has some defensive savvy. he'd get beaten without too much bother but wouldn't get KTFO by a guy now known for his punching power, unlike sticky wicky.

    uhhhh yes.

    anyway, you avoided my questions, typical of a hatton fan.

    what did urango do to deserve his chance with hatton?

    who are the realistic, better and bigger options out there for hatton?
     
  7. Strike

    Strike Boxing Addict banned

    3,982
    0
    Sep 14, 2004
    You think Hatton looked worse against PBF than Gatti?

    In regards to point 4....pretty much why there is no point in taking the fight then eh?
    It is a lose lose in regards to the haters. He loses, he is a joke who was exposed by Witter. He wins, he is a joke who picked on an old Witter and who would have been exposed by a prime Witter.:roll:

    Yeah great fight to earn some respect.
     
  8. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Why would i say his a ***** if he unified 140? If his the best guy at 140 simply fight the best opponents. All this picking and choosing isnt a hollywood view of boxing its reality. The titlist`s his fought apart from Kostya is shambolic. Hatton says he wants his next fight to be at home. We can safely assume that his ruled out Ree`s ruled out Witter isnt going to fight Paulie so his next opponent will be a tin can. Ahh nothing beats the glory days does it!:roll:
     
  9. Strike

    Strike Boxing Addict banned

    3,982
    0
    Sep 14, 2004
    That is the blind hatred that makes your points on this irrelevant. It is PATHETIC to be wheeling out the "semi retired" bull****. Tsyzu was "semi retired" before he fought the IBF champion and number 2 in the world Mitchell and obliterated far more easily than he beat him previously.
    Tsyzu was the universally recognised king of the division, NOBODY including you gave him a chance in hell and Tsyzu was coming off the back of a fantastic victory.

    But no, he was semi retired, old and washed up...blah blah blah.:-:)roll:
     
  10. Strike

    Strike Boxing Addict banned

    3,982
    0
    Sep 14, 2004
    :lol: As if you would give props for fighting Rees. It is all conjecture on your part, you say it will be a tin can. If it was announced as one of the guys YOU picked as a good opponent who was in their prime and who he would apparently never face, you would now say it was a poor match up and he was a fraud.
    It does not matter who he fights you will find a way to dismiss it. End of story. I don't have that irrational hatred for any sportsman.
     
  11. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    To be fair, in terms of resume depth, Witter probably has the best shout. But let's face it, it's not exactly outstanding, is it? Nothing he has done screams out that he'll be any more of a threat than any of the others at this weight class.
    If he beats Demetrius Hopkins, again it's nothing outstanding, but it should be good enough to truly confirm him as the most deserving. But once again, he has no fan base, so why should Hatton carry someone a man he dislikes to a big pay-day?
     
  12. bizzer07

    bizzer07 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,246
    1
    Dec 11, 2007
    why the bs excuses for witter not fighting judah, Mayweather wont fight at lww again but hatton stepped up to him, why shouldnt witter step up to the man who beat his ass?! ... hang on i can hear the excuses coming already!!

    wtf i never said urango deserved to ffight him and everyone knows he didnt, it was just to get hatton hyped up in america, and it dam sure worked, considering witter was still boxing on friday nights on sky, no one knew who the **** the chump was in america. Now dont go saying how i feel americans are all that matter coz there not, but hattons goal was to go for the best before he retires, he built his name up, and i feel he fought well against PBF, no shame in losing to the best. No way could witter do that, he would be beaten inside 4, if the first round doesnt get to him too much which i think it will.

    how about you just go be a bit more of a witter 'nuthugger' and go get angry about why he is a crying little *****, " oh i hate ricky, hes rubbish" give it a break!
     
  13. bongsbomber

    bongsbomber toreet mon Full Member

    208
    0
    Sep 18, 2007
    There really should be no arguments here - Witter is the WBC belt holder - Hatton claims to be the best in Light Welter division - well cut the bull**** and get it on.
     
  14. Betty Swollocks

    Betty Swollocks James 'Lights Out' Toney Full Member

    5,709
    1
    Jul 21, 2004
    I admit Wicky is not as bad as I thought he was, I picked Tszyu to beat him. So did you, and you were another who scoffed at the idea the fight would happen when the rumours first came out.
    I didn't consider all the factors Hatton had in his favour that night though.

    BUT the fact Tszyu has not even looked close to fighting again does indeed suggest he was winding down and taking one last payday. Sharmba Mitchell was never that good at all, and if the old threads were still about you would see I wrote him off long before he remtched Tszyu. A win over Mitchell meant very little.

    It's hardly blind hatred, I have a more balanced view that the core of moronic hatton huggers.
     
  15. Strike

    Strike Boxing Addict banned

    3,982
    0
    Sep 14, 2004
    I did indeed pick Tsyzu and I was sick of Warren protecting Hatton, so I crticised, just as I did with Calzaghe until he took on Lacy and then Kessler, then I stepped back and gave credit.
    At the time Tsyzu showed plenty of signs he would fight again, he came back from surgery to reclaim his spot and whipped Mitchell who was the number 2 end of story. You might not rate him but he was deemed good enough for PBF a few years down the line. The point is who else should Hatton have faced over the recognised number 1 and a guy who had just blitzed the recognised number 2?

    I do agree he should fight Witter and IMO Witters best performance and win was in his last fight, so the bout is very relevant.