Jack Dempsey vs Ken Norton Primes

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jun 27, 2010.

  1. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    19,229
    Likes Received:
    259
    Personally I think Willard has a very good chance.
     
  2. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Messages:
    18,318
    Likes Received:
    58
    The Mauler shatters that fragile jaw in one! :ko
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,995
    Likes Received:
    28,005
    Whether or not Dempsey hit harder than Foreman and Shavers, he was a much better finisher than either of them.

    I would add that however good or bad Norton was, he has everything going against him stylisticaly here.

    Norton is going out and quickly.
     
  4. bman100

    bman100 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Messages:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    28

    you made this thread just for him didnt you?:Dlol
     
  5. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    8,271
    Likes Received:
    63
    :lol::lol: Dempsey would've KO'd Norton the first time he landed - and he would land in the first round because he always did - Wills wouldn't have lasted much longer either - he got sparked by Paulino - not to mention by a virtually blinded little Sam when Harry was in his best form. - very funny though Kenny805 :lol:
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    279
    Foreman and Shavers are both more brutal finnishers than Dempsey, Dempsey just didn't have the same firepower of those men and wasn't as rangy. I didn't see the evidence that he's a better finnisher against Tunney either.

    Norton's durability gets a bad rap, both Ali/Holmes would have stopped him if he was that fragile. Shavers/Foreman are perhaps the 2 biggest punchers in history and he was maybe past prime. Norton may well take Dempsey's shots and fight back like he did against Quarry, Ali, Holmes

    When he has a man hurt, but he often needs 100s of punches to finnish his man. Against Firpo/Willard he was able to throw wide haymakers because both men had wide open defenses and were very slow. Against Norton he won't be able to do that and if he does he is liable to being counter punched

    Norton may even KO Dempsey, who was sparked in a round himself

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RICD8ojVQbE[/ame]

    I haven't made a pick in this fight as there are too many question marks. Factors that may well influence it are: Glove Size, rule set,
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,995
    Likes Received:
    28,005
     
  8. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    279
     
  9. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Messages:
    15,756
    Likes Received:
    102
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    279
    He hits hard but his power is well overrated, LHWs sucked up his shots. He took 100s of punches to put Willard/Firpo away, hes a puncher, but rarely a 1 punch lights out type
     
  11. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Messages:
    15,756
    Likes Received:
    102
    Willard was actually a tough son of a *****, he had great heart, and a very good chin.
    Yeah, well, Foreman isn't a 1 punch knockout artist either. He has thudding power. Look what he did to Norton. I'm sure Dempsey could do it too.
    To even assume Norton has a chance is stupid. Norton can't take a good punch.
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,995
    Likes Received:
    28,005
     
  13. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2005
    Messages:
    19,404
    Likes Received:
    279
    I keep hearing this claim, but when did he survive a puncher? Firpo and Dempsey, the only notable punchers he fought, both stopped him. Yeah he was past his best against them, but that doesn't mean he proved himself against a puncher. And no, Johnson, particularly the 37 year old disinterested one, does not count as a dangerous hitter.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,995
    Likes Received:
    28,005
    Arthur Pelkey
    Luther McCarthy
    Gunboat Smith
    Carl Morris
    Frank Moran

    All punchers.
     
  15. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Messages:
    15,756
    Likes Received:
    102
    Johnson had KO power in either hand imo. pretty good power.
    and Willard was tough. weather you want to believe that is questionable. He had heart to keep coming from from those knockdowns.