Jake Lamotta vs Micky Walker at 160

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cotto20, Sep 18, 2009.

  1. cotto20

    cotto20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,836
    Likes Received:
    22
    Who Wins And How???????
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    279
    Walker was a better boxer and more proven against a greater ranger of fighters through more divisions, so I'll go with a Walker UD
     
  3. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    23,559
    Likes Received:
    5,872
    This would be a great fight, but I think Walker would take it......Better fighter in my opinion, but tough to call.....
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,997
    Likes Received:
    28,008
    I am leaning towards Wlaker, but I would not put any money on it.

    LaMotta had a style that has demonstrably given Walker problems.

    I would not stand too close to the ropes incase I fell in!
     
  5. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,241
    Likes Received:
    158
    Walker would do well to repeat the Ace Hudkins II performance but not the first fight where he slugged it out. LaMotta's chance would surely be to take an unsuspecting Walker by surprise in their initial encounter with his great strength and bullying tactics.
     
  6. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    Messages:
    21,677
    Likes Received:
    52
    x2

    lamotta was cunning, had good skills and all but walker was a different level.
     
  7. DaveK

    DaveK Vicious & Malicious Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,668
    Likes Received:
    36
    I'm with the majority: Walker wins a decision in a tough fight, but you can't discount LaMotta's chances...

    Both too tough to be stopped by the other, but Walker's heavier punching and sharper shooting make the difference.
     
  8. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    18,285
    Likes Received:
    411
    The prime Mickey Walker [without Johnny Walker],who flattened Brit Tommy Milligan,in
    1927,would certainly defeat the tough LaMotta. Walker hit harder and was faster on the attack, than Jake...A fight ,for the ages, would be Ace Hudkins hooking up with Jake LaMotta. Two tough S.O.B's from different eras...
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  9. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2010
    Messages:
    6,736
    Likes Received:
    102
    No knock on Jake, but I can't think of anything he can do better than Walker. Mickey appears to me to be just as strong physically. He was just as sturdy, just as fast (maybe faster. it's debatable), can box and slug. Plus his power was superior to Jake's.

    I like Walker by UD. Jake hangs tough but if both are at their best he is outfought.
     
  10. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2010
    Messages:
    6,736
    Likes Received:
    102
    :good

    LaMotta-Hudkins. Wow....somebody call the police. And a good surgeon to repair the ruined faces of both guys after this bout.
     
  11. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2010
    Messages:
    8,063
    Likes Received:
    34
  12. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    18,285
    Likes Received:
    411
    Surf, in the 1940s,while on our way to MSG, my dad took me into Mickey Walkers Bar and Grille,on 8th Ave@49st. By luck Walker was standing behind the bar joshing with customers
    Though a neophite, I was thrilled to see the Toy Bulldog, who my dad saw in the 1920s.
    i remember his Irish pug nose,still. I rate Mickey walker as a middleweight in the top 5,but of course behind Harry Greb...What 160 pounder since the Mick, could take on bigger and
    heavier men ,as Paul Berlenbach, Leo Lomski, Johnny Risko,and the 42 pound heavier Bearcat Wright. And fight a FIFTEEN round draw with the prime Jack Sharkey ? Answer
    NONE. And of course lick these big men...What an apt boxing name, "The Toy Bulldog ".
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  13. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,931
    Likes Received:
    82
    Given this, I'll take Walker by close UD.
     
  14. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2010
    Messages:
    6,736
    Likes Received:
    102
    Prett amazing stuff BB. One would think that sluggers of the magnitude of Berlenbach and Lomski would have knocked Walker stiff. His success against bigger fighters like that is mind boggling.
     
  15. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Messages:
    11,632
    Likes Received:
    345
    Too often we lament the dearth of certain footage while not always fully appreciating what actually does exist. What we see Mickey do in Hudkins II would not likely be believed if we hadn't all seen the film for ourselves. It's an incredible document of Walker boxing on the retreat in the pocket, among other things. He was lauded in print for his foot speed right from his debut against Dominic Orsini. Rub Mickey down with Oscar Lamb's horse liniment before the match, and he's sure to replicate Hudkins II with LaMotta.