What makes Charlo any good then by that logic? Charlo based on arguably losing to Austin Trout? The same Trout who lost to Canelo, Hurd and Lara far clearer?
exactly so, pal, thats why i said u had a good post, pressed the "like" button for it and that its maybe so that its "not maybe at all". you appear to have a bee under your bonnet with people agreeing with you and liking your posts. Lighten up, are you auditioning for the sequel to "Kill Your Friends"?
I'm actually impressed with the level of competition both Charlo brothers have faced, especially the last couple years (for the most part.) They might not be taking on guys with big names, but they're definitely taking on high risk fights with extremely low rewards. Austin trout is a dangerous fighter who gives pretty much all of his competition hell. Jermall's win over Julian Williams goes unnoticed for some reason even though Williams would give anyone at JMW serious problems. His brother just knocked out Lubin last year I believe, a very promising fighter who might've taken the bout one or two fights too early, but is still a very dangerous opponent at JMW against anyone. I see both Williams and Lubin as future champions, no doubt. Anyway I don't know if it's their antics outside the ring or maybe just how destructive they are inside of it; most of the top tier guys with any name recognition don't seem too keen on facing either of them (especially Jermall who I rate to be the better fighter of the 2.)
When getting a gift against a bum like Austin Trout is your best win you no the hype for Charlo is fake as **** lmao