Is there anyone on this forum who actually enjoys the senseless ramblings of this joker? Last night,for me,was the final straw..... He fails to break down the fights well, is as biased as they come and most importantly is completely annoying. Please vote.
Get him to ****, he's a *****. Why the **** is someone like him earning a salary and Ken Buchanan, who's opinion is worth so much more, ignored.
Never liked Jim Watt, hope he ****s off sooner rather than later. His annoying voice rambling on talking bollocks spoils every fight he commentates on for me like. That Adam Smith chap as well, he irritates the life out of me.
I generally like Watt, but he misread last night badly. The point wasn't that Fury showed heart, it was that John mac performed so well and landed ALL the important shots. Watt (and most of the sky panel) let O'Connor off the hook
Agree with all of that. Uzi. He is solely to blame for all of these 'robbery' calls as well. God knows why he's so in love with McDermott- I'm gonna watch it again later and try and count the amount of times he actually mentions Fury. Close fight, and McDermott did enough to win, but he made it sound like it was some sort of schooling. They are all a bunch of tossers. Adam Smith is the jester at the Sky castle as well. What a tit he is. As for Kerr and Bunce, good things were never meant to last:deal. Can you imagine Sky reading feedback from forums and what-not yesterday? What also annoyed me yesterday was Sky's plug of P4P again for PBF-JMMatsch.
Jim Watt is OK, he's just calling it how he sees it. If someone else was commentating then people would be moaning about them instead.
He's OK? Why settle for someone who is just OK? Lets get someone in with a bit of charisma,someone you might actually ENJOY listening to and will add something to fight night.. **** settling for something thats OK. Sometimes a change is a good thing. Skys whole set up just now is so predictable.