Joe Calzaghe vs. Ezzard Charles

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KOTF, Nov 22, 2009.

  1. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2009
    Messages:
    8,715
    Likes Received:
    8,951
    In 1 rd. even an english reff couldn't find a way to save Calz. in this 1. Charles in 1 rd, coming off of a three day drunk.:hat
     
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    82,426
    Likes Received:
    1,478
    Can I just say I went to see Calzaghe so I'm no hater. I also think his resume is thin and on a good day he may scraw into my top 100.

    Reason being that he has a lot of good attributes, that to be fair didn't get him far against the best fighter he ever faced, and I personally feel Hopkins now is just as formidable in his peak, for slightly different reasons for approaching a decade ago now.

    However, Joe is in with a sharper puncher, a better combination puncher, better at mid-range, which negates Calzaghes best attributes, the ability to shift up in pace throughout a fight and change his gameplan.

    Calzaghe, who despite being a boxer was an aggresive fighter is going to be getting hit by one of the fighters who had amongst the best punching form I've ever seen on film. His resume is filled with names, numerous of which would beat Calzaghe as efficiently as I'm predicting for Charles.

    Round 5 stoppage, Charles, dictating the pace at centre ring, with Calzaghe probing with his jab, lands a left hook off his own jab and floors Calzaghe. Who tries to get up but can't clear his head and falls back to his knee, counted out and decisively beaten.

    Calzaghe holds no advantages.
     
  3. mightyd40

    mightyd40 Spartan Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    2,264
    Likes Received:
    13
    :lol:
     
  4. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    4,458
    Likes Received:
    4,101
    Wouldn't it have been easier to simply say that you detest Calzaghe?
     
  5. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Messages:
    7,766
    Likes Received:
    94
    30-1 in votes (two for Calzaghe were accidental). Can't get much more decisive than that.
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    66,221
    Likes Received:
    53,689
    I probably think more of Calzaghe than most here... however, he was a natural 168 and fighting against a natural LHW (who was perhaps the greatest LHW of all time) who moved easily up to HW... no chance
     
  7. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    4,458
    Likes Received:
    4,101
    I'd say Calzaghe was a natural light heavy who boiled down to 168; it was no secret that he had difficulties making the weight.
     
  8. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,241
    Likes Received:
    158
    He probably weighed more by fight time than Charles did as a light heavyweight.
     
  9. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    4,458
    Likes Received:
    4,101
    True. Not that it would help him in the end, although his unusual style might at least give him a slight stay of execution before Charles found his rhythm and ended matters.
     
  10. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2007
    Messages:
    5,633
    Likes Received:
    59
    So far Calzaghe has been up against Qawi, Billy Conn and now Ezzard Charles.

    Unsurprisingly he has not managed to win a single one or even do that well, but should he continue along this route he'll surely record one of the best resumes of all-time.

    Edit: Oh, and Charles knocks him out, surely.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    66,221
    Likes Received:
    53,689

    One thing that is absolutely true, the longer a fighter is retired, the better he gets. Give Calzaghe a couple decades and he will be mentioned with the best.

    Personally, I would give him a chance over Conn and Qawi, at his very best.
     
  12. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    4,458
    Likes Received:
    4,101
    No, sorry. I'll give him credit where credit is due, but he isn't beating Conn, the man never lost a fight as a light heavy in an era that was stacked with top fighters. And Qawi would be bad for his health, too strong, too savvy and too relentless. And I don't underrate Joe; indeed I think he'd be trouble for a lot of past greats. Just not Qawi or Conn, not enough to beat them anyway.
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    66,221
    Likes Received:
    53,689
    Fine. I don't have enough passion for him either way. However, it seems half the reason for this site's existence is to tear down Calzaghe. I officially extract myself from the fray.
     
  14. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,063
    Likes Received:
    5
    Not by me he wont.

    I dont wanna keep bashing him either though, he was a good boxer, over-protected. Threads like this are unfair.
     
  15. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    4,458
    Likes Received:
    4,101
    :roll: