Joe Louis 1930's vs Sam Peter today.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by young griffo, Oct 12, 2008.


  1. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,238
    2,434
    Mar 26, 2005
    Joe Louis is charged with manslaughter against Peter...can we finally stop talking about how Peter would have beaten Marciano..Louis..Dempsey...Ali..etc now??
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,827
    44,521
    Apr 27, 2005
    Peter would be very lucky to beat a good version of Joe Bugner, let alone Louis.
     
  3. SteveO

    SteveO MSW Full Member

    4,255
    14
    Feb 4, 2007
    I hope so.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,827
    44,521
    Apr 27, 2005
    Hence my realistic thread vs Bugner.
     
  5. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,496
    7,261
    May 18, 2006
    I finally got around to seeing Frazier-Bugner the other day and I've got no doubt that version of Bugner would box the ears off of the fat,slow,inept version of Peter we got yesterday.
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,827
    44,521
    Apr 27, 2005
    Totally agree, totally. I was actually thinking of making it Tex Cobb instead of Bugner.
     
  7. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,496
    7,261
    May 18, 2006
    Did people seriously think Peter could beat these guys before yesterday??

    As I said earlier I hadn't seen much of him before yesterday but it really opened my eyes to how bad todays Heavies are if someone of Peter's limitations can be a World champion today.

    I'd class him with Seldon,Botha and probably Leon Spinks as one of the poorer fighters to hold a Heavyweight world title.
     
  8. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,496
    7,261
    May 18, 2006
    Could you kindly keep away from threads started by me in the future thanks.
    I'm after the opinions of the 99% of posters on this forum whose opinions I'm interested in and respect.
    I'm neither interested in or respect what you've got to say as you've shown yourself time and again to be a classless,racist,half-wit without a single redeeming feature.
    Cheers:good
     
  9. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    ...Slightly off topic, but the Klit brothers aside, the heavyweight division stinks. Really, it stinks.

    It's so bad, they are looking to an untested cruiserweight to generate some excitement. Some division.

    On the undercard of the Klitschko - Peter fight, I watched 2 other heavyweight fights. All four fighters were fat. One was a grotesque pig whose back wobbled about like a bowl of jelly when he moved. His opponent, the hyped Odlandier Solis, who looked as slow as a glacier, was also overweight, although he showed at least some athletic ability.
    (Read: he looked like a poor man's Frank Bruno, with a layer of fat around his middle.)

    People go on about superior conditioning, superior diets and superior training. In the lighter weight classes that seems obvious, but the heavyweights? They should just call it 'fatweight' and be done with it.

    We're too easily fooled by sheer weight these days. These fatties and their GH bloated physiques aren't impressing me.
     
  10. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
  11. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006

    Agree with all of this. Suddenly the 80's doesn't look so bad given todays lack of depth, infact the likes of Thomas, Dokes, Page, Tubbs and Berbick all at their best would definitely stand a great chance of holding at least one belt in todays climate. All had ability for sure, more talented than virtually any of todays punters, but most of 'em never quite pieced it together consistently enough. Holmes and Tyson would sweep up the current division, not to mention the 90's top men (the likes of Lewis and Bowe). The Klitchskos, Wlad in particular are good enough fighters, but nothing that daunting.
     
  12. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008

    Just because one era looks even worse than another one does not make that one any better.
     
  13. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Not to sound like a whining git, but yes. The 80's fatties were almost skinny by the standards of some fighters today.

    You have the Adonis-like Klits...and everyone else, most of whom are fat, fat, fat.

    Joe Louis would tear the contenders today a new one, no question.
     
  14. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    I don't think anyone has ever said Peter and conditioned in the same sentence before unless there's an "isn't" between them :lol:
     
  15. abraq

    abraq Active Member Full Member

    1,376
    19
    Sep 17, 2007
    Sam Peter ends up with a mangled face. Stopped in the sixth.