Joe Louis vs. Vitali Klitschko

:-( Is it not obvious yet that this guy is a troll?

And Louis makes some adfustments after a shaky start and cuts up Vitali with quick accurate right crosses over the top. The only question in my mind is does Louis get a TKO on cuts or does he become the first to knockout Vitali?

 

Im pretty sure Elroy has a poster of the Klitschko Brothers that he pleasures himself to!!..This guy is something else

 

one of the reasons I am getting tired of this website is the trolls and those with a hatred or agenda for one fighter or another, they have an agenda, sometimes is bigotry other times its an era prejudice,size prejudice and other times its to make another fighter look good. I am all for a difference of opinion and dialog but when someone makes a statement that Mormeck would KO Louis, it is either a prejudice for or against,lack of knowledge or just a troll....some dig deep, some are just ridiculous....I can argue for the reasons of my opinion and others shall also but you get a little battle fatigued when it is all in vain

 

co-signed

 

Yes he did.

His losses to Lewis and Byrd were real and absolute losses.

No other fighter gets asigned some sort of notional victory if he is ahead on the score cards when stopped, and neither does he.

 

According to you, Jersey Joe Walcott barely knew how to box. You really have no clue what you're talking about.

OK,

1. Chris Byrd was a blown up SMW.

2. Show us evidence of fighters in Louis's era using their heads as defense. I can wait.

Once again, you show your bias. There are bums in EVERY era. And fighters like Tyson Fury, Deontay Wilder, Chris Arreola, and Dereck Chisora aren't defensive masters/technical giants in any universe.

Please, tell us how one-dimensional Huck and Lebedev beat Louis.

 

go back and do your research, study boxing, watch some fights and someday you may qualify to post on the classic forum ...right now you are not even funny

 

Nearly every post you have made concerns a Klitschko in some form or another.
Who really has the agenda here?

 

Rather not.

 

While I disagree with your position I can see much of your argument till you crossed over to Louis couldn't be a cruiser weight champ today. That enters into a different debate, one where fighters of the late thirties and forties did not know how to box which is absurd considering how many more fights they had. If anything, they were far more advanced than today's fighters in every way excluding performance enhancing drugs, something both Klitschkos use to some degree with out question. Image a roiled up Louis? Frightening.

 

Elroy's grip on reality is rivaled only by Charlie Zelenoff...

What if..... They are one and the same???:admin

 

Just kidding.

Zelenoff isn't as literate. Every bit as ******ed though.

 

I dont understand how or why Louis would be a punching bag against the dizmle (at best) HW division we have today!...Without legit reasoning.
I would also say there is atleast 10 opponents of Joe's that might be champion in any era! You under estimate this era and the boxers who fought in it.
Your the only person on here that couldnt make it more obvious that you dont od your Homework on anything pre 2004. Everyone your callin nutbags are atleast answering with detailed well driven facts where you come out with semi facts and ridiculous rants, and you wonder why 90% of the forum thinks your trolling!?
Your acquisitions about Joe Louis are far fetched. Your not gonna convince the rest of the world otherwise just because you peg Klitschko as a God.
If your gonna continue to talk out of your ear atleast do it with some class and reasoning.