Joe Tessitore puts Floyd on blast, says he's not good for boxing

You never discuss anything you damn jackass, someone just took their time to post a reply to your bull**** and all you could do in return is say, that what I expected from you, oh and don't forget the smiley face.

:rofl

 

Glad I could help you... Now if you want to point out anything I said that was wrong, or anything you don't agree with please do... Otherwise continue to **** with Floyd fans on ESB who are easy targets. :thumbsup

 

atsch It's not a matter of opinion on whether I am discussing the topics ******.

But I know at this point, you will pretty much say anything about me. tht's how you fanboys work. try calling me the worst poster. Or the biggest hater. that always works right ****. :roll:

 

Man these double standards just **** me off. Floyd gets crap for everybody he fights and then once he makes them look ordinary and they crap on the opponent, Pacquiao goes on and fights them and they want to ride his ****

 

... yeah, and Oscar, and Ricky. Joe "don't know **** about boxing!" If you say that Floyd cherry picks, you better say the same about Manny. Even Freddie admitted to it!!!

 

Manny fought Mosley for money.. not a problem... I give a list of reasons why Floyd may have fought his recent opposition... Precisely what was expected of me.. I must be making too many excuses for Floyd Should have just said money.

 

Right. As if anything I point out, you will consider. No point to it, you proven my point perfectly, as stated. I bascially walked you into it. :thumbsup We're good! Take that as win if you need.

Please don't get high and mighty on me. You do the exact same ****. A ton of you floyd fans love to cry about what I say to idiots, yet you have no qualms doing it yourself. :roll:

 

I will give you another angle.
Tessitore wants to be apart of the argument and in order to balance out the whole Teddy Atlas thing he goes and hops on the manny band wagon.

 

When have I EVER not considered what was brought to me in a debate? When have I EVER been unreasonable with you? I believe I'm one of the VERY few Floyd fans who actually try to have a decent debate with you.. Then you come with this ****. You asked if I thought those reasons where why Floyd chose his opponent, then when I say no and explain why, you pull this. Yeah dude. :roll:

Again, this isn't about you ****ing with other Floyd fans... It's the fact that WHEN someone tries to actually debate **** with you on an intelligent level you pull **** like this and rather just **** with the ones who bring no debate... I **** with Pac fans, but when someone actually wants to debate I debate.. Not write off what they say and move onto an easy troll to **** with. Not the reason I'm here. :thumbsup

 

bs, mayweather waiting 4 pac when mayweather is older ... pacturds everywhere

 

Div...most thing EVERYONE says they believe. Everyone thinks they are unbiased.

I pprecuiate you trying to have debates. You and maybe three others floyd fans are the only ones I can tolerate.

LOok at the two scenarios. Every opponent Pac picked was with dubious reasons accordingto you. But for Floyd, nothing of the sort. So, that said, if how you see it, that's fine.

The truth is, BOTH Guys carefully pick theitr opponents. Floyd AND PAc, but I'm not going to try to act differently brecasue I like one over the other. That seems to be how I differ from most here.

Goving one fighter alll the benefits of the doubt while not giing the other any type of credence does not indicate intelligent debate. Sorry dude. I don';t see too much honesty on your part when it comes to Pac.

 

I didn't say every opponent Pac picked was with dubious reasons, to my knowledge my post was about him picking Mosley. Then I added in Oscar. Didn't say **** about Clottey, Cotto, JMM or Hatton. And if you read my posts I believe in one of my very first ones to you at the beginning of the post I clearly stated that you've NOT heard me play up Floyd's recent opposition... So if that's what you're going on about you can quit now. I'm not someone who makes an excuse for a fighter choosing fights he will win and I stated that FIRST.

I never gave anyone the benefit of the doubt. You asked a question, and I answered with my honest answer. NONE of the reasons you listed were the reason Floyd fought the fighter he did, IMO. I gave reasons why I believe otherwise... Did ANY of my posts say he was excused for those decisions? Did any of my posts say it was the best available fighter skillwise or anything of the sort? No. YOU assumed, like you try to say Floyd fans do all the time. If you would have asked WHY Floyd choose those opponents, you would have gotten the same answers... And if you asked IF those were the best opponents for him to face, you would NOT have gotten a yes from me. :thumbsup

 

When Pac signed to fight Clottey Mosley was still supposed to fight Berto. Remember, the fight that was on until Berto cancelled after earthquake in Haiti? Strike 1.

At the time they were still testing the waters with anything above lightweight. Pac at one fight at lightweight, fought Oscar weighing just over 140, then fought at 140, where people were saying Hatton was going to be too big for him. Shane was having to come down from Jr Middle in the meantime. And Pac's next fight after supposedly ducking Shane? Against Cotto, who beat Mosley.

So when a Jr. Middle Weight who comes into the ring as a Middle Weight calls out a fighter who was just fighting at lightweight, it's not cherry picking by the bigger guy, it's the smaller guy ducking. Interesting.

Strike 2. Want to try for 3?

 

Mayweather is still good for boxing but there's way better.

 

he chose him because the fans demanded that fight since the floyd/manny fight didn't happen.

plus shane went into the ring when floyd beat jmm.