They love listing "Klistchko, Povetkin, Takam, Pulev, Helenius" with no context. As if all those guys weren't 40 years old and far removed from their prime. Look at all the effort they go to to try to prove that a younger, faster, ACTIVE CHAMPION version of Klitschko fighting at home is a worse fighter than a 41 year old who hadn't fought in 18 months. "But it was a more entertaining fight!" Joshua getting knocked down = Vladimir is better? Is Pringles much better than we thought? Anything and everything to avoid facing the truth: this guy isn't as good as Eddie is selling, never was.
Tbf Fury looks like a mummy in the ring at this point. I had some hope AJ and EH finally had aged out Fury enough. They still wont take the fight. Unbelievable. How poor of a boxer AJ may be, Fury has declined much more and is there for the taking.
Why? If a fighter is in the top 10, they are in there for what they have done or doing, not for their ages. What does anyone's ages have to do with them being in the top 10?