This does not surprise me,people fed up of seemingly not great quality fights on pay per view.Good fight that it is Dillian White v Oscar Rivas is really taking the mick.And it is only going to get worse
I think hayers has been so deeply offended by something fury has said or done in the past that it now colours his view of everything fury says and does since then. Hayers appears to be one of this new breed of people who LOVE to be OUTRAGED!!!! And will cling onto that feeling of indignation for dear life. Fury meets hayers deep seated need in that sense. That’s my take on it.
Never had any issue with travellers. I routinely point out whenever this comment is raised how I think the likes of Hughie Fury and Andy Lee come across as perfectly decent, nice, genuine people. I don't really like people who find amusement in tormenting desperate addicts or drug cheats who suggest women who have had abortions are as bad as people who abuse children. But then, I'm not really sure why anyone would like people like that.
Calm yourself down, sweet cheeks. You’re right, some of the things that Tyson has said and Saunders has done are not very nice...fair play for standing up for what you feel is just and right. Anyway, your hero, what’s his name...the lad who was on remand in Reading Prison...I forget his name, had to wear a tag upon his release, found in possession of a class-B drug, talks about the superior black race....got bounced all round the ring by a short, obese Mexican. Name escapes me but he gets a pass from your high moral judgement. You’re entertaining, mate. I’ll give you that.
Yes. You’re deliberately missing my point though, Tony. I’m pointing out to you that your personal moral code is flawed. You highlight or ignore the wrongs depending on whether you like or dislike that person. Your bias is off the scale. Anthony Joshua, Tyson Fury and Billy Joe Saunders. One is your hero, two of them you can’t stand, yet all 3 have all at some point said or done things that are socially (and lawfully) distasteful. To slate two of them but overlook the third is inconsistent.
You don't understand that morals can be adapted? Or put in context? I mean, selling cannabis is illegal. Murder is illegal. I'm not so stupid as to equate them. You think what they have all done is equally distasteful? Fair enough. I don't really know why. I find some of the things Joshua has said to be very stupid; a sign that he's not a very clever guy trying to sound clever. But Fury and Saunders have come out with stuff that sounds really nasty. Hateful even. As I've said - you think he's some mental health ambassador? Stick yourself in the mind of the gay kid who's twelve years old and shitting himself realising he's gay, reading Tyson tweeting that gay people are no better than child molesters. Why support that?
Calm down Gayers, he was merely pointing out your arguement is flawed in which you seem blind to. Being a supremecist isn't equal to having morals that you believe in, Fury has the same right to express what he feels as much as you have to be offended by them. We can't live in a world where people must not have opinions on issues because a group, quite often the loud minority get offended by them.