i am in no way slagging off any boxer or trainer for what they have done...im saying Billy moaning about judges is incredible after the gifts Burns got
With the fullest of respect Kevin would never beat Ricky he's simply to good for him. Yes Crawford is excellent stylistically all wrong the guy was class but when has it been wrong to say your beaten by the better man?
No disgrace losing to world class fighters but please dont mention Ricky in the same sentence as Crawford as Ricky aint world class anymore if Crawford is the bench mark I think your wrong about Mitchell, answer me this who is the better boxer, because for me its Mitchell.
Ricky cant be mentioned in the same sentence as crawford? did he get banged out in the 2nd round? Naw so shut it ***
Got to laugh at posters on here I think if Nelson went to London he'd get the very best of talent What he done with Burns was remarkable so what could he do a proven top talent?
Mate seriously ask Kevin who's the better fighter/ boxer whatever Ricky is better in every dept beleive me
Ricky is stronger and has a better chin then kevin thats why he won, if your saying Ricky is the more skillful then Kevin you need to go to spec savers
Well you will know better than me, not only have I seen them fight 4 rounds for real I've seen them spar 20 odd rounds as well but as I say you will know better than me
If you work with a fighter, of course you're going to take a different tac about a decision. It's fair enough to pillory judges for not getting a decision right, it's fair enough to pillory commentators, but to hammer someone associated with a fighter for publicly taking a supportive angle is ****ing stupid. Fighters and those associated with them are allowed to say they won when they lost. All a part of putting yourself in harms way.
I agree totally,but for that someone to then start a thread whinging about judges decisions must be verging on trolling.:yep