Your dumb....sorry, sad but true. Taylor is a fraud. Pavlik is great....yet Pavlik's best win is vs Taylor, who by your account is a fraud? Doesnt that make Pavlik unproven then...seeing as how his biggest win is vs a fraud? Again...you and the rest of you saying this **** are dumb. No way to sugar coat it sorry.... :verysad
If I had the time or inclination I could dig up dozens of similar posts to my original going back several months. It's not a case of being wise after the event fellas!!
You misunderstand my friend. I'm not saying Kelly Pavlik is the second coming of Ray Leonard, simply the FIRST live challenger Taylor has faced and I predicted ANY live challenger would end his dubious reign. I'm not saying Pavlik is great, merely that he has done us a favour
yeah, I hate how everyones talking **** on Taylor who fought a hell of a fight and proved Pavlik doesnt have the best chin around either. Taylor fought the fight people wanted him to fight not his own and thats why he lost imo. I believe if Pavlik fought a great boxer puncher like Hopkins he would be beat to the punch everytime and Hopkins would make Pavlik look like a ametuer in the ring, Pavliks punches are to slow to be effective against a guy like Hopkins and Pavlik would be countered all night. I like Pavlik but he lacks alot of skills in the ring and extremely slow hands, his heart and power won him that fight and I see him losing against guys like Hopkins, Wright, and Calzaghe.