What pressure? Acting hard? Just telling you that you shouldn't be so judgemental when it's apparent that none of you know any of them. This is a boxing match, yet most of the posts on this **** excuse for a forum are personal insults directed at Froch and his family. I would love to talk Boxing with you, but that's not what this place seems to be about...So just letting you know that your little Golden Georgie Boy will not be your pin up for long...Someone will spill the beans at some point - and then you can all have a good chat about it on here. Until that time comes you can all keep posting about Lee and Rachael and Carls nose and everything else that doesn't matter at all..... This forum is probably the worst on the net.
Says the guy implying that someone is a paedo... sick ****. If nothing comes out implying that Groves is a paedo, then that's as low as it gets. Also, I don't mind Froch, his brother is a fat plum though.
Hey Lee you fat poofy ******* :hi: Stop looking at pictures of men's d!cks And why were you were you swigging the water bottle today after Groves embarrassed you? Was it nerves or was it something to do with the 10 pints of Stella you drank last night you fat bloater? :finger
So Groves split with Booth, so did David Price after a few weeks. You say the facts are simple, yet your giving no facts. If you can't substantiate what your saying then whats the point in posting?
Somebody KO this ***** already. Seriously Matchroom and Sky need to tell him his irrelevant and has no place in this event. Props to the ITV reporter who asked Froch if his brother does all the talking for him. That was classic!!!
Nobody wants to work with George Groves. But before the IBF mandated the fight, Groves turned down Eddie Hearn's offer for the fight because Hearn wanted to commit Groves to more than one fight as a matchroom fighter. Groves only wanted to commit for one fight, because he has plenty of options open to him. Will be interesting to see how Hearn behaves if Groves does what he should do on 31st May. Meanwhile, Adam Booth co-commentating on the first fight was absolutely gutted, and spoke with Groves after the fight. He said they'd remain friends but wouldn't be working together. That's fair enough and doesn't indicate that there was anything too dodgy going on. The difference between Froch and Groves is that Froch needs to surround himself with entourage of yes men. He's like a playground bully who surrounds himself with people who'll laugh at his jokes. It's tragic. Meanwhile Groves did his ringwalk in Manchester on his own, to a chorus of boos, and faced down Froch and his team before the fight. Completely unfazed he dumped Froch on his arse a couple of minutes later and left the arena to a chorus of cheers because, despite being robbed, he still behaved and spoke with dignity. Froch thought he had die-hard fans, but has now realised that most UK fight fans will support any UK fighter who's facing a foreigner for a world title, regardless of their personality. Now people have a choice between two UK fighters. One is a young, exciting boxer who acts with decorum. The other is a scummy egotistical **** who doesn't know how to behave himself. The shift in public opinion away from Froch has been especially funny as he has such a fragile ego. Can't wait to hear him booed into the ring at Wembley.
It's quite easy to screen grab inboxs...it's just as easy as looking up ****s and posting them on twitter.