Marquez won all three fights but he never ruined the Pacman,the Pacman is just slowing down a bit because he has been a pro for over 15 years and has other distractions such as politics..
Nah, it's only natural that a 33 year old guy who's been fighting professionally since the age of 16, has been in as many physically taxing bouts as he has, has over 350 rounds in pro fights (who knows how many rounds he sparred too), who relies so much on speed and explosiveness rather than technically sound fundamentals, would be on the decline. Marquez is no spring chicken, the guy is in his late 30s, and he's past his prime too. Marquez is just an excellent fighter who will always gave Pacquiao hell. When Pacquiao is believed to have peaked in 2009...he still would've been given hell by JMM.
Not the case. Just another racist comment by you because you have nothing better to say. You are obviously threatened because I am better than you.
Ruined would imply JMM was pummeling Pacquiao...hardly the case. At the end of the day you still had a counterpuncher who got out punched and outlanded. Pacquiao slowing down is a combination of age and getting use to his silk boxers. He doesn't fight with the same hunger nor killer instinct....the two main attribute imo that made him great.
Look at it this way: Why did the powers-that-be decide to give the fight to Bradley? Because JMM had so ruined Pac's reputation, that a Bradley win suddenly seemed plausible, and made more sense financially. If not for Juan, this would not have happened. So yes, JMM ruined Pac, in that he destroyed the Pac myth.
You guys feel robbed i have a 500 dollar cash out ticket from The Orleans for that fight,standing in front of the tv going and the new then the bomb dropped **** those judges seriously **** them.