Mike Alvarado vs Pac would be something I would like to see but i dont think they will fight provodnikov as he's also trained by Roach. I still think vs Guerrero would be good, imagine if he knocks out The Ghost. Message sent perhaps?
What I meant was he doesn't need to prove anything anymore. At one point i wanted him to become undisputed WW champ as an icing on the cake that is his career. Unless he beats mayweather then any wins or losses will either be labelled as "well he was never gonna beat Manny anyway" or "Manny is past it".
Alright PUNK, first of all, nobody is talking about all those other fighters. What we DO is talking about your clown of a congressman and his addiction to PEDS, and JMM... BTW, show me one "IOTA" of proof he's been roiding like lots of pacquiao fans now claim!!... Yep, that's what I thought,clean and refreshing KTFO6!!!
no....that was a disinterested pac that bradley fought, especially those later rounds. pac didn't even care about being robbed.
Aren't we overlooking Rios? a young hungry lion. Pacquiao makes a hell of a lot of mistakes, mainly when he is in attack mode. Marquez toyed with Pacquiao on the outside.Manny had to press Marquez,the mistakes Manny makes was plain to see ( he gets out of control) off balance, open for counters, he misses a lot is WILD as hell.Sometimes he loses the plot and swings at air, reckless MOFO. But of course you are taking a risk exchanging with Manny but NO PAIN, NO GAIN, right? I think Rios can pull of it off. But his lack of speed is a bit of a worry.However he is strong and tough. Maybe just maybe he can take care of Pacquiao.
if you add a PED expert plus the sudden change in physique, you got your proof right there. with pac, you only have the crackhead and his scared son spreading rumors.
Oh, okay. Maybe you can win me the lottery too, since you're a psychic. I mean, you can tell what I'm thinking and all. So give me your numbers. If they don't work, you owe me.
I don't have any idea what you were thinking specifically, but in general terms you obviously expected it would be competitive or else you wouldn't still be itching to see it. :good It was never going to be competitive. That doesn't require being psychic to determine. Do you need to be psychic to determine that Pacquiao vs. Salita would be a mismatch? How about Wladimir Klitschko vs. Zuri Lawrence? These are examples carried out to absurd extremes, obviously the disparity in level of ability between Mayweather and Pacquiao is much narrower than in those examples but it's the same principle in effect. We don't need to seriously entertain a hypothetical argument for Salita beating Pacquiao, because he was a few levels below. Ditto Lawrence, there's pretty much no question he wouldn't beat Wlad. There's pretty much no question Pacquiao would have always lost to Mayweather. He is a great fighter in his own right, but a few levels below and stylistically would have been in for a rude awakening. (contrary to what most believe about that match-up, as everybody at some point whipped themselves into a frenzy of group-think about how southpaw + speed + swarming = Mayweather doing a Wilhelm scream and falling to pieces...with no basis for thinking so...)
Mayweather will take PAC to school that's why he needs OSDT, afraid for his health, PAC must prove that's he not a Terminator, PAC must join his company, and the list goes on .