Let's Settle This Once And For All: Vitali Klitscho vs Tyson?

All those guys were dominant champs as was Tyson, if the Klits were really that good, Vitali would have been able to beat a very faded Lewis, as other great have been able to do. As for Wlad he lost to ****ing Ross Purrity, and nearly paniced his way to defeat against the limited plodding Peter.

 

uuummm, yea?? as a matter of fact he did. vitali looked as if he got hit with a louisville slugger judging from how violently his head snapped back. now if a former golfer can do that to him, what makes you think a monster like tyson couldnt? who has more talent in his cuticle than sanders will ever have in his entire body.

 

I don't think so, I never rated Bruno all that highly but then again, I'm not a Brit. I always ranked Lewis highly, does that help? :yep

 

sorry, its just history suggests otherwise. anyone who says anything thats positive about klitschko you consider them intelligent, no matter how much of a douche they come off as. so you might wanna consider a change of character if such allegations suprise you....genius.

 

Anyone can see that Arreola isn't in Bruno's class.

 

So Gomez is an immobile plodder? That's just a single recent example but VK has beaten fighters with power, with skill & won just about every round while doing it too. That's why I can't really see a decision win for Tyson.

 

That's a fair opinion and I don't even like Punisher :yep





















Just messing wit ya!

 

accept klitites, hell even mexicans would say "hell to the no" to that BS.

 

Gomez was a 35 yr old who never did anything at HW except get KTFO by D-class Diaz, in spectacular fashion.

 

is gomez a fighter worth talking about?? even if he was in his prime when he fought vitali? gomez was your basic run of the mil boxer with no glaring strengths. the fact that he wasnt a plodder is irrelevant, he was still a mediocre opponent.

 

Bull****, that was a quick stoppage and Gomez obviously didn't take Yankme Diaz seriously just like Lewis didn't take Rahman seriously.

 

He's an excellent boxer, skills wise. Much better than Frank Bruno regarding skills.

 

people that dont agree with yu aren't idiots, its just you klitschko nuthuggers see everything through black and white. if we go against you, your an idiot. if we support you your intelligent. so there's no point in arguing with someone who wont accpet criticism. im all for an intelligent debate, but you klitites wanna turn everything into a **** flinging contest.

 

He is better than anyone Vitali has beat, and I'd bet the house that he wouldn't have lost shot version of Lewis that Vitali lost to.

 

80's Cus D'amato Tyson's speed, bobbing, weaving, and counterpunching would break down Vitali. Vitali has an iron chin, but like his brother, had stamina issues even today where they slow down and Iron Mike had the power to break his body down. Vitali's jab and uppercut would be his best weapons vs. Mike as well as his intelligence, but prime Vitali just not fast enough to evade Tyson. I think Tyson would win 6 or 7 out of 10 times they fought because Vitali is no pushover either and I have to give credit to the guy.