Limited fighter over coming a more technical fighter

Not buying this. Give them 24 ounce gloves, take away the hand wraps (or otherwise require that the match goes to a decision like Dempsey-Darcy), and I think Mike takes the decision pretty easily.

Tyson was much the faster, the straighter puncher, more elusive on defense with his upper body movement and bent knees, and an excellent jabber. Would like details on just where Berbick held technical superiority over Tyson.

 

The ghost of George Foreman beat a prime Michael Moorer

 

Margarito-Cotto 1

 

John Ruiz vs. (fill in the blank)

 

If you think Khan is more skilled than Peterson I'd suggest you watch more of their fights.

Actually, reading your second line I suggest you don't bother, I'd watch more Duran first atsch

 

Every fighter is limited in some way.

 

Carl Froch then.

 

Froch is a more rounded fighter than Khan, IMHO.

He can box and fight. Khan struggles at both disciplines unfortunately.

 

Carl Froch vs Jermain Taylor, outboxed and just broke him in the final round

 

No Duran is certainly more skilled than Leonard. You're making the mistake of assuming the faster man with faster hands, greater athleticism and more movement is more skilled. If Leonard and Khan were so much more skilled why were both easy to hit? Neither had the defensive skills to slip punches in the pocket

 

Peterson won that fight. :huh

 

Segura-Calderon

 

Abraham in about any fight he won.

 

Curry - Jacquot