Pat O'Grady once created the WAA as his son Sean was walking from the dressing room to the ring for a welterweight "title" fight.
The confusion does my head in more than anything else in this sport. TBRB are a massive step in the right direction. But I fear they need more than media support, they need media absolution and until the media stop crediting title holders, this fracture will forever remain.
It could destroy the sport as well; all hell would break lose trying to put a universally acceptable criterion together to make a 'linear world champ' and so I suspect there would be none and thus the whole sport would be 'blacked out'.
Riasco lost to Kobayashi who lost to Yum who lost to Gomez who lost to Meza who lost to Pintor who lost to Payakaroon who lost to Fenech who lost lineage Since then there has been no establishment of a universally recognized linear line.
Thanks.:good Apparently (according to lufcrazy) Rigondeaux is/was linear champion, so perhaps he somehow established a new line. But I'm not sure how that's possible if the concept of lineage is being ignored. I consider myself fairly hardcore purist in some of these matters but I really don't have much motivation to protect the fabled lineage of a pointless minor division that was fully invented only in the 1970s at the whim of the alphabet organizations anyway. Personally I'd preserve the concept of lineage for meaningful divisions with prestige, the old traditional seven or eight divisions. And even then I can see points where the lineage became meaningless (due to so many retirements, etc.)
Gomez didn't lose to Meza. After Gomez left the division Morales beat MAB. After Morales left the division Ayala beat Adams. After Ayala left the division Vasquez beat Larios who lost to Marquez who lost to Vasquez. After Vasquez left the division Donaire beat Nishioka who lost to Rigondeaux.
It's possible because Donaire and Nishioka were the two highest ranked SBW fighters on the planet and the winner was the new champion.
So Donaire v Nishioka established the latest line in October 2012. Rigondeaux won the title a few months later, April 2013. I'm not impressed. I'm not even sure the division should be recognized as worthy of a recognized world champion though. If we're going to insist on linear champions, ONE champ per division, let's get rid of the pointless divisions at the same meeting.
You don't have to be impressed. I know DM being lineal champ for so long doesn't impress me. I know Stevenson isn't impressing me right now, nor is Canelo. To be lineal you just need to beat the previous champ. If that champ has left the division the top two contenders meet to replace him.
Yes, you are clearly right. The lineage clearly finished with The Bazooka. The other claims have certain merits to them, particularly if they claim to be the best rather than linear, but after Gomez there has not been a Lineage champion.
Not a T-Booze lineal champion, of that we clearly agree. There's been a lineal champion in the sense of 1v2 which is what I trace and I know the TBRB trace. CBZ try tracing it but their researchers are ****. Ring did their own thing. Although one thing I do strongly disagree with you on, lineal isn't always best. Stevenson is not the best LHW in the world despite being the man who beat the man. Same with Canelo.
Like a 'TBooze lineal champion'; first and second rankings are 'just' opinion. A lineage world champion is in boxing always an abstract concept... As shown by the 175lbs linear, which although some same Stevenson, it could be argued the Hill/MaskeI lineage is still be broken and thus Andre Ward is champ...
They are opinion, I go with the opinion of the TBRB but there are other neutral ranking bodies that people might prefer. Things can always be argued. Brings me back to my original point. I hate the lack of clarity in this sport.