Lineage in today's climate

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Mar 30, 2016.


  1. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    Pat O'Grady once created the WAA as his son Sean was walking from the dressing room to the ring for a welterweight "title" fight.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,371
    21,816
    Sep 15, 2009
    The confusion does my head in more than anything else in this sport.

    TBRB are a massive step in the right direction. But I fear they need more than media support, they need media absolution and until the media stop crediting title holders, this fracture will forever remain.
     
  3. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    It could destroy the sport as well; all hell would break lose trying to put a universally acceptable criterion together to make a 'linear world champ' and so I suspect there would be none and thus the whole sport would be 'blacked out'.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    I'm still not clear on the 122 pound title lineage.
    Can anyone list them ?
     
  5. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Riasco lost to
    Kobayashi who lost to
    Yum who lost to
    Gomez who lost to
    Meza who lost to
    Pintor who lost to
    Payakaroon who lost to
    Fenech who lost lineage

    Since then there has been no establishment of a universally recognized linear line.
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005

    Thanks.:good

    Apparently (according to lufcrazy) Rigondeaux is/was linear champion, so perhaps he somehow established a new line. But I'm not sure how that's possible if the concept of lineage is being ignored.

    I consider myself fairly hardcore purist in some of these matters but I really don't have much motivation to protect the fabled lineage of a pointless minor division that was fully invented only in the 1970s at the whim of the alphabet organizations anyway.

    Personally I'd preserve the concept of lineage for meaningful divisions with prestige, the old traditional seven or eight divisions. And even then I can see points where the lineage became meaningless (due to so many retirements, etc.)
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,371
    21,816
    Sep 15, 2009
    Gomez didn't lose to Meza.

    After Gomez left the division Morales beat MAB.
    After Morales left the division Ayala beat Adams.
    After Ayala left the division Vasquez beat Larios who lost to Marquez who lost to Vasquez.
    After Vasquez left the division Donaire beat Nishioka who lost to Rigondeaux.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,371
    21,816
    Sep 15, 2009
    It's possible because Donaire and Nishioka were the two highest ranked SBW fighters on the planet and the winner was the new champion.
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    So Donaire v Nishioka established the latest line in October 2012.
    Rigondeaux won the title a few months later, April 2013.

    I'm not impressed. I'm not even sure the division should be recognized as worthy of a recognized world champion though.
    If we're going to insist on linear champions, ONE champ per division, let's get rid of the pointless divisions at the same meeting.
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    As for Quigg v Frampton, I thought it was British or European title or something. :D
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,371
    21,816
    Sep 15, 2009
    You don't have to be impressed. I know DM being lineal champ for so long doesn't impress me. I know Stevenson isn't impressing me right now, nor is Canelo.

    To be lineal you just need to beat the previous champ. If that champ has left the division the top two contenders meet to replace him.
     
  12. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Yes, you are clearly right. The lineage clearly finished with The Bazooka.

    The other claims have certain merits to them, particularly if they claim to be the best rather than linear, but after Gomez there has not been a Lineage champion.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,371
    21,816
    Sep 15, 2009
    Not a T-Booze lineal champion, of that we clearly agree.

    There's been a lineal champion in the sense of 1v2 which is what I trace and I know the TBRB trace. CBZ try tracing it but their researchers are ****. Ring did their own thing.

    Although one thing I do strongly disagree with you on, lineal isn't always best. Stevenson is not the best LHW in the world despite being the man who beat the man. Same with Canelo.
     
  14. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Like a 'TBooze lineal champion'; first and second rankings are 'just' opinion. A lineage world champion is in boxing always an abstract concept...

    As shown by the 175lbs linear, which although some same Stevenson, it could be argued the Hill/MaskeI lineage is still be broken and thus Andre Ward is champ...
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,371
    21,816
    Sep 15, 2009
    They are opinion, I go with the opinion of the TBRB but there are other neutral ranking bodies that people might prefer.

    Things can always be argued. Brings me back to my original point. I hate the lack of clarity in this sport.