List of Heavyweight Champions With Most Title Defenses

I used the US as an example because the first thing that came to mind was Mayweather fans and Pinoy-American Pacquiao fans. Nice post though man, just rise above it. :good

 

I waited 3 pages until someone pointed out the obvious...thanks for that:good

Ali, Louis and Holmes all beat everyone there was to beat, over a long period of time. You can't say the same about the Klits, both have unavenged losses in their prime to pretty average opposition.

 

Yup, the grass was greener back then and those fighters were 10 feet tall, chins of steel and threw lightnings with their eyes. Now, I think I hear kids are playing on your lawn. You should probably go and chase them off.

 

Corrie Sanders would be insulted if you were to refer to him as a "golfer". He was a badass BOXER with one of the most wicked lefts in recent times.

Do you obsess over the fact that Henry Cooper knocked Ali (Then Clay) through the ropes with a wicked left hook. Clay was givin' smelling salts to recover?

Do you obsess that Schmelling whupped the holy **** out of Louis?

Do you obsess that Rahman and McCall KO'd Lewis??

Do you obsess that little Michael Spinks defeated Holmes twice?

But you do obsess that Wlad lost to an extremely dangerous puncher in Corrie Sanders 7 years ago?

:nut fckin pathetic

 

yeah... but too bad almost all of those defenses are against **** opposition. besides, there's no way he ever surpass either Holmes or Ali in greatness. sorry to disappoint you but wladimir is average compared to the grew heavyweights. Defenses don't reall matter for wlad anymore really be aide they are likely gonna be up against **** fighters.

 

So you put Wlad in a no win situation. Defenses don't matter? :huh His career is not over. He may yet get to fight the likes of a Leon or Michael Spinks someday! So who's he supposed to fight? And should he lose to the ones he is fighting?

 

One thing is true, you need to rule in a relatively week era to rack up a bunch of defenses. All these guys have that in common.

 

Klitschkos are the very best and the "sour grapes" are proving it.

 

Ive taken you to school on here before Rushman, dont make me do it again.

Dont be a ***** with your racist comments , and your blanket ideas.

 

True but consistency and longevity get´s him up there eventuelly. Not Top10, possibly not Top15 but very probably Top20. What is quite an achievement, considering gloved boxing is around for 130 years and hundreds of thousands hws existed since then.

 

I do. Because that was an awesome fight and an awesome win over the biggest destruction machine hw has ever seen. Joe Louis was a golfer too.

 

If wlad can rack up 2-3 fights a year for the next 4-5 years he can challenge louis for most title heavyweight defenses, well within his reach.

 

Actually, you didn't. You tried to, but when, for some reason the discussion went to M-theory, you realised that I can back up what I say.

You must be mistaking me for someone else.

Besides, the only people who seem to be offended by that are those who have a guilty conscience. As I said, if you aren't one of the offenders then you can get on with your life without worrying.

 

I havent mistaken you for anybody else , we both know exactly what you represent, and you took it to M theory not I , and your answers was taken from Wikipedia.

Dont come on here as if you have some divine right to call a Nation and all its people.

As I have said before your posts are just too bitter, go get laid.

Merry Christmas.

 

Ok, let's recall.

You posted something supercilious. I mocked you, eventually comparing your "oh so amazing" insight into a discourse on M-theory. You challenged me to explain M-theory which I did.

I did it in a way, which although basic, showed that I grasped the concept - rather than merely copy/pasting stuff from Wikipedia as you so glibly put it.

You then congratulated me on being someone who can back their **** up.

Now you show up in another thread, and somehow call that a 'schooling'? I guess it was, but not in the sense you mean.

The last time I had anything to do with you, you came down from your high-horse long enough to end on a reasonable note. Was that an aberration?