Log in or Sign up

LOL!!!! Just looked at Pac's last 7 fights and it made me laugh!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lakers2432, Nov 2, 2009.

Page 7 of 9

Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

Joined:

Oct 28, 2007

Messages:

9,268

Likes Received:

0

UliUli said: ↑

Paulie Malignaggi who was brutalized by Cotto, got a gift against Lovemore Ndou and Herman Ngoudjo!!!

Also Hatton was already KO by Mayweather, and nearly KO by a shot Lazcano.

Also, Oscar had just got done filling his veins with IV. Weight drained to hell, 36 years old, and fighting in a weightclass he hadn't seen in a decade!

Diaz was a title holder who received his title against a SHOT Morales in a CONTREVERSIAL fight!

Yeah, he was, and most philipino media outlets had JMM winning, including ******* hero "Pacdbest" had it a draw!

Barrera was on his 18th year as a pro and had been in more wars than the U.S. wars combined!!!

Solis is a B level fighter, nothing more.

Morales was just the third fight in which Pacquiao was avenging his previous loss. He took on a hall of famer to prove who's the best, and he won two out of three.

Yeah, "GREAT resume!"
Click to expand...

If you think PAC's resume is not good.:think
Have you tried analyzing JMM's resume?!:shock:

Honestly better consult with president of JMM's fans club before you answer this :rofl:rofl so as not to get owned again!

Silvermags, Nov 3, 2009

#91

dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

Joined:

Mar 8, 2008

Messages:

7,856

Likes Received:

0

now im thinking who has a better record (last 7 fights) than pac at this moment :think

dhenzrae, Nov 3, 2009

#92

tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

Joined:

Jan 22, 2009

Messages:

6,396

Likes Received:

0

LOL @ the haters....The only div in which pac didnt fought the top fighters were LW and WW, and although DLH was not the top dog, pac was the heavy underdog...Pac aint p4p#1 for nothing...lol

And oh, IF pac dominates cotto, these haters will have another excuse...Nothing new....

Right now, *******s have the bragging rights...until then...haters cry, *******s laugh!!!lol

tolindoy, Nov 3, 2009

#93
Ilesey ~ Full Member

Joined:

Jul 22, 2004

Messages:

38,201

Likes Received:

2,602

Lakers2432 said: ↑

For a guy who gets credit for fighting the best all the time and not ducking anyone his last 7 fights made me laugh when I read them and remembered who he really faught.

Hatton at 140 who was all ready showing signs of being past it. Almost KO by Lazcano. Thank goodness for shoe laces. Oscar at 145 was a complete joke as well as shell of himself. David Diaz at 135 LOL this title means absolutely nothing lol. Way to pick the toughest test Pac LOL

JMM at 130 great great fight. Who won this fight again:huh LOL. This is the only legit fight he has had in his last 7. MAB 2 What a joke MAB was past his prime and coming off a lost to JMM as well LOL. Way to go for a challenge Pac.

Jorge Solis at 130 What a tough test Pac Way better then the 130 pound champ Guzman lol are you kidding me. Morales 3 at 130 also a joke against a HOF fighter who was coming off a loss and was way past it. Just my opinion but I don't think Pac has been fighting the best. Men and women lie but these are facts. Not hating just looking for the world beater resume and can't find it.

Only one fighter has been fighting the best fights out there and his name is Miguel Cotto. Clottey,Margorito,Mosely,Zab, and now Pac. Cotto is the only one in the game right now fighting who ever. Pac is weight draining and beating bums or fighters past their prime lol:hi:
Click to expand...

:blood

Ilesey, Nov 3, 2009

#94

dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

Joined:

Mar 8, 2008

Messages:

7,856

Likes Received:

0

Ilesey said: ↑

:blood
Click to expand...

and the thread title has LOL too!!!

dhenzrae, Nov 3, 2009

#95
(PimpThaSystem) Well-Known Member Full Member

Joined:

Jun 7, 2009

Messages:

1,774

Likes Received:

4

rayhogan said: ↑

(PimpThaSystem) said: ↑

The double standards exemplified by your posts are simply stunning.

Almost all resumes can be criticized under intense scrutiny.

Take Cotto for example. You talk **** about Manny's victories over competition that was past prime, yet you include the Shane Mosely and Zab Judah from 2007 as great wins???

^^^Mosley is coming off a big win by destroying Margarito in which proved Mosley is not over the hill like Barrera and Morales was. <<Thats a clear fact

You criticize Manny's win over Marquez stating Marquez was the real winner and then turn around and say Clottey was a great win for Cotto when the consensus is that Clottey deserved the win.

^^^There are few i guess you one of them thought Clottey beat Cotto while there are many including ring side reporters thought Marquez beat Pacquiao in the rematch.

Yeah let's talk **** about Jorge Solis and David Diaz but then you forget about the lesser opponents that Cotto has faced recently, ie Gomez, Jennings, Urkal.

^^^I'll give you that but lets be real. Who has faced fighters that was in their prime more times for the past 6 years? Pacquiao or Cotto?
Bottomline: your analysis is biased and flawed.

In other words: You Fail.<<<<<<<You fail.
Click to expand...

You were never great at reading comprehension in school, were you?

If you read the first two sentences in my post (which im sure you ignored) you would realize I'm not trying to say Pacquiao's resume is better than Cotto's or anything like that. All I'm saying is that you pick apart ANYONE's resume and trash it.

I find it hilarious that people still consider Mosely in recent years to be a prime fighter. So a win over Margarito proves that Mosely isn't over the hill, but a win over Pacquiao doesn't prove Morales wasn't over the hill? Barrera beats Juarez twice and then has an exteremly close fight with p4p Marquez but then in his next fight with Pac, he is somehow shot? Sorry but your logic fails. hard.

Mosely's one of my favorite fighters but clearly his legs are gone and its so obvious from watching his fights with Cotto and Margarito. The win over Margarito just goes to show styles make fights.

I don't get your point with Pacquiao/Marquez II and Cotto/Clottey. Both were fights with decisions that were disputed by fans and reporters alike. Don't believe me? Look it up.

Again if you could read, you would know that I'm not trying to turn this into "whose got the better resume: Pac or Cotto" I'm just pointing out the asinine double standards that I see everyday on this board when it comes to ******s assessing Pac's resume.

But hey thanks for proving my point ^ :hi:
Click to expand...

(PimpThaSystem), Nov 3, 2009

#96
pngo #1Contender Full Member

Joined:

Apr 24, 2007

Messages:

7,543

Likes Received:

1

It had to be a 10 year old Kobe fan.

pngo, Nov 3, 2009

#97

Simple100 Active Member Full Member

Joined:

Apr 10, 2008

Messages:

1,329

Likes Received:

0

Lakers2432 said: ↑

For a guy who gets credit for fighting the best all the time and not ducking anyone his last 7 fights made me laugh when I read them and remembered who he really faught.

Hatton at 140 who was all ready showing signs of being past it. Almost KO by Lazcano. Thank goodness for shoe laces. Oscar at 145 was a complete joke as well as shell of himself. David Diaz at 135 LOL this title means absolutely nothing lol. Way to pick the toughest test Pac LOL

JMM at 130 great great fight. Who won this fight again:huh LOL. This is the only legit fight he has had in his last 7. MAB 2 What a joke MAB was past his prime and coming off a lost to JMM as well LOL. Way to go for a challenge Pac.

Jorge Solis at 130 What a tough test Pac Way better then the 130 pound champ Guzman lol are you kidding me. Morales 3 at 130 also a joke against a HOF fighter who was coming off a loss and was way past it. Just my opinion but I don't think Pac has been fighting the best. Men and women lie but these are facts. Not hating just looking for the world beater resume and can't find it.

Only one fighter has been fighting the best fights out there and his name is Miguel Cotto. Clottey,Margorito,Mosely,Zab, and now Pac. Cotto is the only one in the game right now fighting who ever. Pac is weight draining and beating bums or fighters past their prime lol:hi:
Click to expand...

atsch

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl nut:nut

Simple100, Nov 3, 2009

#98
rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

Joined:

Aug 26, 2006

Messages:

22,780

Likes Received:

350

kalunya5964 said: ↑

Yeah, Diaz was a weak belt holder! He should've fought Casamayor who was the linear champ. Hey, wait a minute! Wasn't he the same Casamayor who was beaten by Santa Cruz who was beaten by Diaz? So Diaz may not be a bad win at all considering it was just a probing move-up fight for Pac.
Click to expand...

Cruz was winning the fight until Diaz got him by tko. Casa was coming off over a year layoff prior to his fight with Cruz in which obvious Casa didn't train hard. Casa then went on to tko Katsidis. Are you going to say that Diaz or Cruz is better then Katsidis? Are you trying to say Diaz or Cruz is better then Marquez who Casa made it an even fight until the tko happen? Gtfo.

rayhogan, Nov 3, 2009

#99
tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

Joined:

Jan 22, 2009

Messages:

6,396

Likes Received:

0

rayhogan said: ↑

Cruz was winning the fight until Diaz got him by tko. Casa was coming off over a year layoff prior to his fight with Cruz in which obvious Casa didn't train hard. Casa then went on to tko Katsidis. Are you going to say that Diaz or Cruz is better then Katsidis? Are you trying to say Diaz or Cruz is better then Marquez who Casa made it an even fight until the tko happen? Gtfo.
Click to expand...

It doesnt matter, there was no LW at that time who could give pac a fight, and haters will still have excuses..

casa - old past prime
Nate - old past prime
J.Diaz - B-level who lost to grand pa nate
Katsidis - B-level fighter who lost to grand pa casa

the only fighter who could give pac a fight was guzman, but he cant make 135lbs against nate...so how you want to spin it, pac just cant get enough credit...

tolindoy, Nov 3, 2009

#100
horst Guest

Lakers2432 said: ↑

For a guy who gets credit for fighting the best all the time and not ducking anyone his last 7 fights made me laugh when I read them and remembered who he really faught.

Hatton at 140 who was all ready showing signs of being past it. Almost KO by Lazcano. Thank goodness for shoe laces. Oscar at 145 was a complete joke as well as shell of himself. David Diaz at 135 LOL this title means absolutely nothing lol. Way to pick the toughest test Pac LOL

JMM at 130 great great fight. Who won this fight again:huh LOL. This is the only legit fight he has had in his last 7. MAB 2 What a joke MAB was past his prime and coming off a lost to JMM as well LOL. Way to go for a challenge Pac.

Jorge Solis at 130 What a tough test Pac Way better then the 130 pound champ Guzman lol are you kidding me. Morales 3 at 130 also a joke against a HOF fighter who was coming off a loss and was way past it. Just my opinion but I don't think Pac has been fighting the best. Men and women lie but these are facts. Not hating just looking for the world beater resume and can't find it.

Only one fighter has been fighting the best fights out there and his name is Miguel Cotto. Clottey,Margorito,Mosely,Zab, and now Pac. Cotto is the only one in the game right now fighting who ever. Pac is weight draining and beating bums or fighters past their prime lol:hi:
Click to expand...

The only two things you have proved with this thread are that you are a ****wit and that you can't spell Margarito. Congrats :good

horst, Nov 3, 2009

#101

rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

Joined:

Aug 26, 2006

Messages:

22,780

Likes Received:

350

(PimpThaSystem) said: ↑

rayhogan said: ↑

You were never great at reading comprehension in school, were you?

If you read the first two sentences in my post (which im sure you ignored) you would realize I'm not trying to say Pacquiao's resume is better than Cotto's or anything like that. All I'm saying is that you pick apart ANYONE's resume and trash it.

I find it hilarious that people still consider Mosely in recent years to be a prime fighter. So a win over Margarito proves that Mosely isn't over the hill, but a win over Pacquiao doesn't prove Morales wasn't over the hill? Barrera beats Juarez twice and then has an exteremly close fight with p4p Marquez but then in his next fight with Pac, he is somehow shot? Sorry but your logic fails. hard.

^^^^^^Did you watch Barrera fight with Rocky twice? If you did then you know that Barrera proved he was an over the hill fighter. The first fight Barrera barely and i mean barely beat Rocky. Most people thought Rocky beat Barrera. In the rematch Barrera ran like he was scared to slug it with Rocky. Now tell me is that the same prime Barrera that went wars with Morales 3 times? Is that the same Barrera that schooled Hamed??????

Mosely's one of my favorite fighters but clearly his legs are gone and its so obvious from watching his fights with Cotto and Margarito. The win over Margarito just goes to show styles make fights.

^^If Mosley's legs was gone then Margarito would have won by tko.

I don't get your point with Pacquiao/Marquez II and Cotto/Clottey. Both were fights with decisions that were disputed by fans and reporters alike. Don't believe me? Look it up.

I have and there are few that thought Clottey beat Cotto while there are many and i do mean many that thought Marquez beat Pacquiao. Lets put it like this, whoever thought Clottey beat Cotto should never score another fight again. I don't know how Clottey won the fight. Cotto knockdown Clottey in the 1st round, clearly Cotto won the 4th round, the biggest clearly Cotto won the 6th round. And the last 3 rounds Cotto won those even more clearer. So again how can Clottey won the fight given Cotto got an extra point from the knockdown?

Again if you could read, you would know that I'm not trying to turn this into "whose got the better resume: Pac or Cotto" I'm just pointing out the asinine double standards that I see everyday on this board when it comes to ******s assessing Pac's resume.

^^^You still didn't answer my question, in the last 6 years, who has fought more prime fighters Cotto or Pacquiao?

But hey thanks for proving my point. <<<Thanks for proving my point buddy.
Click to expand...

Click to expand...

rayhogan, Nov 3, 2009

#102
Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

Joined:

Mar 14, 2007

Messages:

22,296

Likes Received:

6

kalunya5964 said: ↑

Jennings was Cotto's Diaz because he was the champion when Cotto fought him.:good
Click to expand...

The only title Jennings has held is the BBBoC title. They fought for a vacant belt.

Brickhaus, Nov 3, 2009

#103
MonsterX Active Member Full Member

Joined:

Sep 6, 2008

Messages:

804

Likes Received:

0

Glad you had such a Loltime

MonsterX, Nov 3, 2009

#104
(PimpThaSystem) Well-Known Member Full Member

Joined:

Jun 7, 2009

Messages:

1,774

Likes Received:

4

rayhogan said: ↑

(PimpThaSystem) said: ↑

rayhogan said: ↑

You were never great at reading comprehension in school, were you?

If you read the first two sentences in my post (which im sure you ignored) you would realize I'm not trying to say Pacquiao's resume is better than Cotto's or anything like that. All I'm saying is that you pick apart ANYONE's resume and trash it.

I find it hilarious that people still consider Mosely in recent years to be a prime fighter. So a win over Margarito proves that Mosely isn't over the hill, but a win over Pacquiao doesn't prove Morales wasn't over the hill? Barrera beats Juarez twice and then has an exteremly close fight with p4p Marquez but then in his next fight with Pac, he is somehow shot? Sorry but your logic fails. hard.

^^^^^^Did you watch Barrera fight with Rocky twice? If you did then you know that Barrera proved he was an over the hill fighter. The first fight Barrera barely and i mean barely beat Rocky. Most people thought Rocky beat Barrera. In the rematch Barrera ran like he was scared to slug it with Rocky. Now tell me is that the same prime Barrera that went wars with Morales 3 times? Is that the same Barrera that schooled Hamed??????

Mosely's one of my favorite fighters but clearly his legs are gone and its so obvious from watching his fights with Cotto and Margarito. The win over Margarito just goes to show styles make fights.

^^If Mosley's legs was gone then Margarito would have won by tko.

I don't get your point with Pacquiao/Marquez II and Cotto/Clottey. Both were fights with decisions that were disputed by fans and reporters alike. Don't believe me? Look it up.

I have and there are few that thought Clottey beat Cotto while there are many and i do mean many that thought Marquez beat Pacquiao. Lets put it like this, whoever thought Clottey beat Cotto should never score another fight again. I don't know how Clottey won the fight. Cotto knockdown Clottey in the 1st round, clearly Cotto won the 4th round, the biggest clearly Cotto won the 6th round. And the last 3 rounds Cotto won those even more clearer. So again how can Clottey won the fight given Cotto got an extra point from the knockdown?

Again if you could read, you would know that I'm not trying to turn this into "whose got the better resume: Pac or Cotto" I'm just pointing out the asinine double standards that I see everyday on this board when it comes to ******s assessing Pac's resume.

^^^You still didn't answer my question, in the last 6 years, who has fought more prime fighters Cotto or Pacquiao?

But hey thanks for proving my point. <<<Thanks for proving my point buddy.
Click to expand...

Seriously dude is there something wrong with your brain?

I never said Barrera wasn't over the hill for the second Pac fight. I was just using the same logic you used to determine Mosely wasn't over the hill. Again, so when Mosely beats Margarito it proves his not past it, but when Morales beat Pacquiao, it doesn't mean Morales isn't past it?

I'm just using your flawed logic.

Mosely, while still a great fighter, is clearly past it. He didn't need his legs vs. a one dimensional Marg; just a good clinch game. Styles make fights.* So what you think the Mosely that beat DLH in 99 is the same Mosely that beat Marg in 09?

I'm really not interested in arguing about Cotto/Clottey and Marquez/Pac, my only point was that they were both fights with disputed decisions and thats ALL.

Who has fought more prime fighters Cotto or Pac? I don't give a flying ****. What part of "I'm not trying to turn this into whose got the better resume: Pac or Cotto" don't you understand??? atsch
Click to expand...

Click to expand...

(PimpThaSystem), Nov 3, 2009

#105

(You must log in or sign up to reply here.)

Page 7 of 9