Loma`s team appealing decision

I watched that Canelo card at a bar casually it was Cinco de mayo weekend and it was a lack luster opponent for Canelo. I didn't score it nor did i score the Canelo fight. With that said it was a war and I thought Sparks won yes spark deserves a rematch.
Just because you win two of the most dominate rounds in a fight doesn't mean you automatically win the fight. Loma didn't drop Haney in those rounds if he did he would've won. 7-5 was my score and like I said 6-6 or loma wining 7-5 would've been acceptable as well.

 

LOL there is just no reasoning with you. Not one credible person scored the fight for Haney, only scum bags with agendas.

 

People like this Olu character are the only ones saying that Haney won the fight.

 

The majority of opinion I’ve seen, especially on social media by boxing people including fighters, ex-fighters and people who have covered the sport for years, is that it was a close fight. Not a robbery.

There’s no such thing as a robbery in a close fight. It means someone has to win, unless it’s a draw.

Sorry your guy lost but that’s the way the cookie crumbles sometimes.

 

The term "close but clear" exists for a reason. I wouldn't even say it was necessarily that close, but it was very clear.

 

No I disagree this type of thinking is why these type of decisions keep happening. A robbery is a robbery even if it is a close fight it should never be justified.

 

That's what I've been saying. I have no problems with anyone who thinks loma won a close fight. My argument and what I have a problem with are people claiming robbery in a close fight because the fighter they liked more didn't get the nod. I really don't understand how this is such a hard thing to understand. The fight by definition does not fit the definition of a robbery in boxing but some of these people are too emotionally invested to see this. How does this compare to RJJ in the Olympics or pea-jcc? It doesn't those are the definition of robberies this was just a close fight nothing more.

 

If it’s a close fight it’s not a robbery.

If enough rounds are close — and there were in this fight — that either fighter getting the edge in those rounds would have enough points to win then it’s not a robbery … it’s a difference of opinion.

Heck, Loma postfight said he gave away the last round. I mean, there’s video of him actually saying that. What kind of idiot hands away a round in a close fight? That’s how you lose.

You think your guy deserved to win. Others did not. Most think it was close enough that it reasonably could have gone either way. Hence, not a robbery.

 

But it wasn't really that close this is the first time in a long time where an overwhelming majority are saying that the wrong man won. Loma is far from an idiot he battered Haney in the 10th and 11th and if everything was on the level that was more than enough to secure the win. There is no way you can make an argument for Haney winning more than 5 rounds

 

You played yourself @Olu G. Rotimi . You deplorable racist.

 

Tons of people are saying it was close. Just because you give the fighter you’re a fan of rounds doesn’t mean everyone sees those rounds the same way.

If you don’t think that was a close fight, I don’t know what to tell you.

Anyone who gives away a round on purpose in a close fight is an idiot … especially a fighter who has already lost a close decision before.

You act like there’s some massive majority who think Loma won by leaps and bounds. Here’s a link to boxrec scoring, where 385 fans have scored it for Loma by an average of 114.68-113.14 … literally swing one round on the average score and the majority see it for Haney. And don’t tell me there isn’t a round close enough to swing in that fight.

https://boxrec.com/en/scoring/2957939

What you’re referring to is an echo chamber, where Loma fans are screaming bloody murder and hearing each other … and concluding everyone feels that way because they’re loud about it.

This was a close fight. Someone had to lose. End of discussion.

 

Loma won this fight down the stretch, No debate about it. Everyone saw that and the vast majority of people agreed he won. This was a clear cut Loma win. Some rounds were close but giving Haney more than 4 in my book is unreasonable.

 

The only idiots are people who gave more than 5 rounds to Haney. What you are doing is just damage control to justify the robbery. There really is just no feasible way under the rules of boxing that Haney won more than 5 rounds. The massive majority believe Loma won whether it was 115-113 or 116-112 is irrelevant a robbery is a robbery.

 

Such a smug backhanded attempt of you trying to act impartial after telling everyone to suck it after the fight you are not fooling anybody. If Loma was given the decision there would've been no out cry at all from anybody credible that Haney was robbed and you know it. What a surprise the two examples you used of robberies were American fighters.