BS. I am not a Lomachenko fanboy. I only mentioned facts. You compare apples with pears. 1. i did not question the KD in general, it was a legit KD 2. fact: The punch did not touch his chin, it went to his nose, it was a straight right hand to the face, no hook or uppercut to the chin. Explaining FACTS with fanboyism is simply bull**** and showing you have zero arguments on your side so better STFU
He got caught by a good shot that he didn't see thrown by a much bigger guy and knocked on his butt. He wasn't pancaked flat on his back or anything like that and he got right up with no problem. Give the guy a break
Full of revisionist history as always. Just like your opinion about Ortiz wilder, which you were already proven wrong. The punch landed flush, right under the nose on the mouth and the chin. So yes it touched his skin, go watch it again
And I hope you know that when people say the fighter has no CHIN, it doesn't actually just mean the real chin lol. It actually talks about the punch resistance as a whole. You could be knocked out with a punch to the top of the head and you can still say he has no chin.
Because he hit the deck after a punch landed. Hence, questions have been raised about his ability to take a shot. And here at ESB, we ASK these questions!
Yes, I know it was a knock down. I'm saying it reveals nothing about his chin. If I pushed you over, you'd fall down but it would say nothing about your chin. He was knocked down for sure, but it was because he was unable to keep his balance, not because his legs went. Not every knockdown is a matter of chin.
What do you mean exactly? I can not remeber being wrong with something there. He ran into a big hand which landed at his face, he get knocked down and that's it. Making a big thing about it is a bit too much.
You may have a point if it was a slip or off balance knockdown. It wasn't. It was a legitimate one, even Loma didn't protest to it , the power knocked him down. That being said, it doesn't mean hes glass, it does show his vuknerabiluties
I know the meaning of "no chin" but still it's a dumb connection here in that case. It was a straight right hand to the face without any defense, he even moved into the direction of the shot. No big deal going down after that especially from a guy who CAN punch! It's okay to question his ability to take shots but still writing things like you did with fanboyism bs is simply the biggest bs. I am not a Lomachenko fanboy AND i did not write anything which was related to some sort of fanboyism.
Oh yes he was hurt. This is a prime example of a fan not having thy slightest clue in thy topic at hand. First you have to know what you clearly don't know, once you've learned you have no idea what you're talking about in regards to a chin or if a fighter was simply hurt, which it's a fact he was hurt. Not terribly hurt but hurt enough to need to recover. The fact he was hurt and you're denying it is either, you're totally full of **** or you're simply ignorant towards the topic. Either way one should steer clear of such topics until some knowledge is grasped
Who is making a big deal out of it? I said it was a great performance, we are just discussing his punch resistance, something that's worth discussing since he did hit the deck yesterday. It showed some vulnerabilities. If you can't even admit that, you are just a fanboy. Nothing more.