yeah, i think pac has a fault there. maybe arum (an/or roach) influenced pac with that decision. what you think?
My guess would be, they agreed to it, thinking Floyd would throw it out later when they demanded the weight penalty.
for the record, i really hoped pac bit on mayweather's bluff. he should have taken the random blood testing **** although i understand where he is coming from. some of us are more uncomfortable than others with needles. and no, tattoo needles arent the same as hypodermic needles. i think getting bllod drawn from him near the fight affected pac psychologically. and pac knew he could not afford the slightest of discomfot when he is coming to fight the best fighter he's ever faced. that's why he didnt take it. both camps have their merits. i just hope they sort their **** out.
Has anyone's opinion of the outcome of a pac v mayweather fight changed since the clottey fight? Up until the pac v clottey fight I was pretty sure Mayweather would beat pacquiao. But now i'm not so sure who would win, i think it will be very close. Has anyone elses opinion changed or are you still where you were before pac v clottey?
What about the fight made you come to that conclusion? A decision in mayweather's favor seems reasonable to me but a knockout?! I find that hard to believe.
You lost me. It's not like PAc hasn't been ko'd before, and it's not like he can't be ko'd. PAc looked too easy to hit last fight, and if you hit a man enough, he will go!
that makes sense. I was just asking why you thought that. there are lots of people out there saying mayweather by KO just because they are mayweather homers or pac by ko for the same reason.