Manny Pacquiao Vs Michael Katsidis in 2011?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Lazarus, Nov 18, 2010.


  1. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    YEs definately. Katsidis doesnt even have one punch KO power. Mosley does.

    If we had to pick i think almost everyone would say fight Mosley over Katsidis.
     
  2. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    That's not a viable fight, at all.
     
  3. Iron Mike

    Iron Mike Active Member Full Member

    899
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
    I don't think I could watch this fight tbh.

    Pac would put such a beating on Katsidis that it would be hard to watch.
     
  4. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Guerrero? To be honest, even if Kats did fight him after and beat him, I doubt a win over Guerrero, compared to a win over JMM is really that big to be THEN the demanding of a Pacquiao fight.

    I disagree. I do not believe Mosley's power will worry Manny. Manny will take his shots and come back. I genuinely believe Mosley is shot to the point of where even his power is declining and not showing any effect (As the fight with Mora had showed).

    The responses do not come as a surprise to me at all. Opinions for people can change in a instant, for example, when Mayweather-Marquez happened, Amir Khan's name was mentioned with Marquez and people said that Marquez would murder Amir, and suddenly after the Mayweather loss, Khan is all of a sudden a dominant favourite if that fight was to happen.

    Surprise? I don't think so. People's opinions on things can change in an instant, and I believe, after Katsidis shocks JMM, there will be a few people who will bring up this match-up, regardless of whether Manny Pacquiao would take him out in 1 or 12 rounds.
     
  5. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Who doesn't Pacquiao put a beating on?

    Would you prefer a shot Mosley who actually lost to Sergio Mora instead?
     
  6. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Explain.
     
  7. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    Really? :patsch
     
  8. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Yes.

    If you believe a fight with Shane Mosley or Andre Berto is any more viable than a fight with Katsidis, then I'll question the seriousness of your posts.
     
  9. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    Are you joking or serious here?
     
  10. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    I'm dead serious.

    Mosley = Shot.
    Berto = No big win to suggest he's worthy, but as viable as a Katsidis fight, I guess.

    If you disagree, then explain, instead of questioning whether I'm serious or not.
     
  11. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    Mosley and Berto are still WAY more viable. They would bring better numbers and would be a more competetive fight. Katsidis would have to come to 147, the fight would be a joke and wouldn't sell, at all. Mosley is a joke fight but would do WAY better numbers and would be more competetive than Katsidis.

    Please explain why you think Katsidis is more viable?
     
  12. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    How are they more Viable?

    Clearly you are basing that on what they draw.

    Mosley can draw a bit. Berto has never been on a PPV show where he's the main headliner, but I don't think he's any big of a draw than Katsidis anyway.

    Why do you care about what Mosley will do in terms of numbers? In the end, we like to watch a good fight.

    Mosley would probably just end up being a Human punching bag who would last longer and then everyone would go on about how he didn't want to quit and is a warrior for staying in there :roll:..

    Sorry, but I don't see Mosley as competitive at all. If you saw his last fight against Mora, he looked like a sack of s**t. Dare I say, even Khan would have a good chance if he doesn't get clocked on the chin :patsch
    Katsidis is a big LW. I'm sure a catchweight could be arranged at 143. Pacquiao came in at what? 144.6 in his last fight?

    In terms of excitement, Pacquiao/Katsidis >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pacquiao/Mosley
     
  13. Caliboxing

    Caliboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,203
    4,556
    Sep 28, 2007
    Katsidis is not getting past Marquez.
     
  14. slantone

    slantone Ring General Full Member

    2,793
    0
    Feb 27, 2005
    i think the reason why mosley has been saying that he has split from golden boy for this fight pitch is because he knows arum wont deal with anyone other than his own company for pac fights, the money hungry jew. (not racist if its true)

    ****ing arum.
     
  15. slantone

    slantone Ring General Full Member

    2,793
    0
    Feb 27, 2005
    i think katsidis is a future star, but not ready in terms of box office and name recognition to be worthy of a pac fight. at this stage- i only see pac fighting the biggest names in the game. i mean hes close to retirement, maybe 2 or 3 fights away. i think he only gets motivated to fight floyd, marquez and maybe mosley- only because he respects mosely and because he d like to beat him harder than what floyd did.

    i dont agree with any fight with anybody other than floyd. i would rather see him retire than fight anybody south of 154.