What's the argument for Williams having a bad chin less alone worse than Valdez? Both were stopped against Liston early, but Machen knocked Valdez out. Something he couldn't even come close to doing against Williams.
Williams was a more dangerous fighter than Valdes. Bigger punch, faster hands, faster movement, bigger and stronger physically
Common opponents between Valdes and Williams (excluding Liston). Omelio Agramonte, Wayne Bethea, **** Richardson, John Holman, Alonzo Johnson, Alex Miteff, Bob Satterfield, Eddie Machen Valdes record: 4-5 with 2 knockouts Williams record: 6–1-1 with 4 knockouts
Marciano progressed beyond the hard fights against Ted Lowrey. And That must be a universal belief. Could Williams progress beyond wins over Daniels?
It's also a universal belief that Williams progressed after his fight with Satterfield. But you don't prescribe to that one do you? Well yes he did progress beyond wins over Daniels. He was number 6. when he fought Daniels and he made it all the way to no. 2 after. We don't know how much he would've progressed because a .357 magnum revolver ended those possibilities.
1. What does that have to do with ANYTHING? 2. Moore lost to Johnson in one fight and had to come off the canvas and from behind to win another.
I believe it was William F. Shakespeare who said "To be, or not to be...If you be what you is...you is what you are. Let loose the dogs of war...and never let a friend in need...be without weed." And what I think he meant when he said this is that he believes these are both punchers. And if you hook with a hooker...you'll...probably lose a game of snooker. I don't think anymore can be added to this thread so, mods, go ahead and close this one down for comments, please.
I didn't say that Williams had worse chin than Valdes. Neither had horrible one, but not great either. Valdes had worse defense than Williams though, which is a bigger weakness than chin to me.
Valdes was a rough, brawling handful. Big like Williams but more ponderous and rugged. Williams was explosive but he waited around a lot. Fought in bursts. More of an athlete. Both were game and easy to hit. Not quite world beaters but honest contenders
Being prime is paramount to evaluating boxers and none of those you proffered as clever defensive counterpunchers weighing195lbs were prime in fact only one of Marciano's opponents even qualifies whether he was prime or not, and that is Walcott. Why you are posting me Moore's stats I've no idea I knew them 60 years ago when you were still swinging in that sack between your Dads legs! Moore defeated Johnson when both were Lhv's and refused to meet him once Johnson had matured further ,that's why he was stripped of his title! Moore weighed 188lbs for Marciano with a half pound difference between them. "since when did getting splattered in 1 round by Johansson give Machen a right to demand a rematch? " Since a contract had been signed for a rematch before their 1st fight! You do not know whether Machen would have avenged his defeat against Ingo ,no more than you know how he and Folley would have done against Patterson.D'Amato certainly had his doubts about the outcome because he ducked both! I posted Moore's and Machen's resumes at heavy, and Machen's compares very favourably to Moore's imo. Machen Beat DeJohn London Jones Rischer A Johnson Mederos Holman Summerlin Baker Maximx2 Jackson YJ Johnson Besmanoff McMurtry Hunter Bethea Valdes x2 Drew with Williams & Folley Machen beat 9 Ring ranked heavies. Moore Beat Lavorante Besmanoff Rischer Dunlap Valdes x2 Henry Slade Bivins Drew with Sys ps Machen lost to 181lbs Johnson by 1 round 5-4-1. Moore beat 4 Ring ranked heavies.