Margarito rejected $4 Million to rematch Williams

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PRproud, Sep 28, 2008.


  1. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Bull****, Reg. You're the one on a campaign for Paul Williams, that's painfully obvious. **** Margarito, I'll say it again. I'm on a campaign for TRUTH. Speaking of evidence - there is evidence, literally, isn't there? Didn't Sergio Diaz come forward with physical evidence, with written documentation that proved that Team Williams avoided them when the request was put out for an immediate rematch?

    Goosen goaded Margarito??? This is the reason he went forward with it??? None of that works for me. You're just off on some other ****.. I'm not even following this, especially the significance of it. What is this "objectivity" ****? That I have to agree that Williams is 50% right about his claims? There's only ONE truth.
     
  2. C.J.Rock

    C.J.Rock Active Member Full Member

    758
    1
    Nov 16, 2006
    Tony will fight Williams and kick his ass , when HE wants to.
    Let Williams settle his deal with Quintana theyre 1/1 if he wants to fight so bad.
    Tony is in the drivers seat now
    Williams and Goofy will just have to wait
     
  3. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Sergio Diaz has a letter that he sent to the WBO requesting an immediate rematch. However, Margo said himself that he would only do the rematch if Arum was involved. Arum also said right after the first fight that he would talk to Margo about him fighting Cotto. If Williams wanted nothing to do with Margo, why did he push so hard to fight him the first time? Arum was all set to have Margo vacate that belt and face Cotto. You can say all you want that you don't give a **** about Margo and you're just after the truth but it doesn't seem that way. I'm not trying to attack you, but that's the way it comes off.

    It's certainly not the sole reason. However, Goosen did push hard for that fight. The plan was for Margo to fight Cotto in June of 2007. After Margo and Cotto couldn't agree to terms, Team Margo participated in a purse bid to fight Williams. Arum countered by threatening to sue Margartio and Goosen. Now you can counter with one of your conspiricy theories, but that's what happened.
     
  4. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    If Team Margarito had to petition the WBO, that implies that Team Williams wasn't cooperating. That's what I would assume - (though I'll admit I'm too lazy to actually research the details..) common sense tells me that much. I'm not suggesting that Williams wasn't interested in fighting Margarito in the first place, I'm suggesting that Williams wanted nothing to do with an immediate rematch.

    The big issue out there these days is surrounding Williams vs. Margarito II, and it needs to be established that the first and only party to keep this fight from happening was Team Williams. These extra theoritical stipulations that you have about "why would so-and-so do this, and why would so-and-so do that?" - I cannot answer. Team Williams wanted to run away with the win, and the belt, and they weren't interested in granting Margarito a rematch as sportsmen. Now they're all over Margarito making claims because Margarito is a magazine cover boy. It's pathetic. How you can you defend that crap?
     
  5. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    When Margo was going around calling himself the most feared Welter and claiming no one wanted to fight him, Williams was the only guy pushing to fight fim. Now Diaz says he petitioned for a rematch, however Williams' manager claims team Margo turned down a rematch, Arum immediately started talking about a Cotto fight after that fight, and Margo said he wouldn't rematch Williams unless Arum was involved. So how could Margo rematch Williams if he only wanted to fight him again if Arum was involved, and if Arum expressed no interest in being involved in a rematch?

    Anyway, that's all in the past. Furthermore, Williams was calling for another fight with Margo before Margo beat Cotto. Go watch the broadcast for Williams vs. Quintana II. Williams said he wanted to fight Margo. Before the Margo/Cotto fight, he again reiterated his desire to fight the winner. Now Williams pushed for a fight with Margo back when Margo was only known for being avoided, and he's made it known several times that he's down for a rematch. His promoter has also sent out Top Ranl an offer. Now if Top Rank isn't interested in a rematch at this time, that's fine. However, I don't see how you can question Williams' desire to prove himself in the divsion.
     
  6. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Post the physical evidence. You can say that you have it, but post it for us to read. Show us where Williams refused a request of a rematch with Williams. show it to us. I read the article of Diaz saying this, but I never saw anything but a protest. Show us please lol...Show us once and for all.
     
  7. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,018
    623
    Feb 21, 2008
    Hopefully some of you dumbasses can read, and this will be the end of all this BS.


    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  8. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    This is about as blatant a whopper as I've read on the situation. I'm talking about the petition comment. But first, you say you want to get to the truth. Williams wanted to run with the title? Is that a truthful comment? So Williams wanted to run away and fight who, Cotto? Even if that were true, how can you even fault Williams? There was no rematch clause. Second, the lie I talk about is the petition argument where you say Williams wasn't cooperating. You do understand what a petition is right? He petitioned for an immediate rematch, and there WAS NO REMATCH CLAUSE. So what was he petitioning? He alsowas protesting the decision of being robbed, and that is where he requested that if in effect foul play was found to be legit, an immediate rematch would be made. There was no rematch clause. Williams never uttered words that he would deny AM a rematch EVER! There are two sides to every story, don't forget that...
     
  9. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Why didn't you post Williams and Goosens comments. They quickly responded to these lies by Diaz. You don't even have a comment from Williams or Goosen lol. All Diaz or AM. In your world, one side matters lol. Post Goosen and Williams comments please.
     
  10. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Williams was cherry picking a slow, lumbering conventional opponent he saw he could exploit with his greater natural size and durability as a Middleweight, by frantically stealing rounds with his superior speed, mobility, and mindless flurries. Team Williams does everything they possibly can to put Paul in the figurative position of being a ringer. I want to see Williams vs. Quintana III, **** dat ****.
     
  11. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,018
    623
    Feb 21, 2008
    Is there a reason why you can't post it? If Williams REALLY wanted the rematch to happen, he could have said right after their first fight and said on national t.v., "I am ready and willing to grant Margarito a rematch." However, he didn't. He ran off, and didn't offer ****. Now that Margarito beat the supposedly top WW, Williams is crying for a rematch? Hahahahaha!! Some people are so gullible.
     
  12. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    What are you whining about? Anybody with a brain knows that the nonsense that Team Williams came back with was WEAK, and clearly less substantial and believable than the claims made by Team Margarito. **** off with the agenda. You want to talk to me, come objective, strictly.
     
  13. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    blah, blah, blah... STFU.
     
  14. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol: You got bitchslapped!!

    Or how about YOU POST them instead of calling everyone liar.
     
  15. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    :yep