Martin murray is 5/1 underdog on sat against john carvalho who is 8/1 on. I dont know anything about this guy apart from a glance at his boxrec page, but i wouldnt have thought that he would be favourite let alone by that much. Is this a mistake by betfred or is it correct? He lost wide UD to zbik and got blown out by golovkin BTW ! Check it out and let me know what you think.
Looks like its just Betfred that have mad an error mate. You can pile on if ya want but they'll only end up voiding your bet. Some will even accept the bet then award your winnings at revised odds so be careful.
yeah ive just checked william hill they have murray 7/1 on and his opponent 7/1 so pretty much opposite. Will it be void though, im sure they couldnt do that if you place a bet at those odds and they only notice it after im sure they cant turn around and say no its void. Its there mistake and if they dont notice and murray wins they cant do anything about it surely. What would stop them from doing that every time somebody won a bet.
You would think so wouldn't you mate...but apparently they can. Well, they can. Come to the betting thread and speak to the people there and you'll see. We've all had situations like this and they ALWAYS get void or even worse settled at **** odds. You might put a tenner on it and end up winning 5 p They're ****s, apparently its a legal contract once you've put a bet on, but not on their side it seems...