masters titles no more

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by maley1984, Feb 24, 2015.

  1. Silent_Service

    Silent_Service Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,736
    Likes Received:
    7
    Haha thanks!

    Nah seriously, were going to have to disagree - just the same as I enjoy watching a Lower league football team at Wembley in the Johnstones paint trophy.

    Truth is the system of titles is a shocker but the masters (not silver & bronze or such like) have worth. If only to help small hall promoters sell a show (a lot would of flunked without these tbh)

    And as I say - it's harming no one if joe bloggs from Lancaster is calling him self the middleweight British masters champion, whereas if he's calling himself the British masters flip fop bronze title then it's a mess.
     
  2. moog

    moog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Messages:
    7,855
    Likes Received:
    6,097
    I disagree with this decision, I can see both sides of the coin, but I believe journeymen, and fringe British class fighters have the hardest sporting 'job' in the UK, and deserve a masters title to aspire to. Yes it should be regulated better so people defend it, and their not used as a pass the parcel, but it should be kept. Also as someone rightly mentioned these belts help promote the kudos of small hall shows and sell more tickets. I think these two reasons more than out weight any negatives of having these belts available.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    404,288
    Likes Received:
    86,374
    :huh

    A step-graded system of recognition doesn't equate to "everybody's a winner". There is a hierarchy in place which for the most part clearly defines the expected quality at each level.

    Odd straw man argument.
     
  4. Silent_Service

    Silent_Service Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2014
    Messages:
    1,736
    Likes Received:
    7
    Exactly ! And the fact is you'd be unlikely to find the likes of Joshua, Campbell, cal smith and so on fighting for a masters title - for two reasons -

    1 they are much more likely to achieve greater goals
    2 they are much more likely to sell a lot of tickets without the titles

    Whereas your lesser known fighters, maybe those without the "0" on they're records may be stumped at either of the above,.
     
  5. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2004
    Messages:
    13,968
    Likes Received:
    14
    Did we get an explanation from the board?

    Or are they just going to launch their own journeyman championship...
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    404,288
    Likes Received:
    86,374
    So this is definitely happening?

    I just stumbled across the Houghton-le-Spring card on BoxRec today poking around to see if there was any televised boxing. (this one isn't - though it does have a few names of mild repute such as Martin Ward - that is, the southpaw bantamweight Martin Ward, not Martin J. Ward the Olympian)

    The main event was for a Masters Bronze flyweight title.

    Shocking to imagine that might be among the last of 'em.
     
  7. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2008
    Messages:
    16,462
    Likes Received:
    2,426
    I don't think many these pro's fighting for masers titles will be botered to be honest. Everybody even the casuals know that it is a con.
     
  8. Tancred

    Tancred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2014
    Messages:
    8,338
    Likes Received:
    4