Max Baer and size advantage myth

After I quoted his "modern Max Baer HW resume"
Yep I guess we can stop here.

 

I already answered your question. It's too difficult to determine. There are too many factors to figure out "averages" for intangible factors like chin and heart.

It's not my fault that you may have ADD, lack the patience or can't comprehend what I wrote. It honestly wasn't very deep or complicated. Nor do I care if you have a problem with it. Take my opinion or leave it. I don't answer loaded questions that don't have a clear answer. If you want to compile data for the average guy's chin in a given era go for it.

-zero resume? He fought tons of guys who had zero professional fights? Or do you mean he fought several man with bad records? If you mean the latter, literally every big puncher has tons of boxers with poor records they inflated their numbers with--no exceptions.

-64% is respectable when youve had 80 fights in a career and are a goofball whose heart isn't in boxing with poor technique, spends a lot of time partying and working on movies and radio, had bad finishing ability and aren't throwing with bad intentions compared to before accidentally killing someone and holding back. Imagine if he was always in shape and had proper form, he'd probably have a 90% ko ratio.

-it's not common for a feather fisted or even an average puncher to kill a trained professional fighter. Even brawls between angry drunks throwing with bad intentions rarely kill each other unless weapons or other people are involved.

-you just proved my point. I brought up Schmeling as an example of a skilled opponent and you immediately responded talking about him weighing less than Baer. If someone brings up Carnera's huge weight advantage and height, you will simply point out his lack of skill. In other words, you will simply shift the goal post when it's convenient.

News flash: no big puncher at heavyweight has a resume full of guys who are tall, durable, weigh a lot, have good stamina, and are very skilled. Fighters like that are very rare.

-what was ridiculous about it? You claimed he only had success due to a size advantage and he fought several boxers who were over 200 lbs and 6 ft or taller. You do realize that almost EVERY heavy weight champion enjoyed a height, reach, and weight advantage over their average opponent? This goes for Jefferies, Johnson, Louis, Liston, Ali, Foreman, Bowe, Wladmir, Vitali, Lewis, etc? If Baer only succeded due to size you would be very disingenuous to overlook the glaring advantages held by his peers. Baer also had far less skill and less technique than them!

Shavers, wilder, and Ruddock often look just as awful in several of their fights yet I never see you criticize them and you keep ducking this point. Literally everyone acknowledges Baer is sloppy. You aren't the first to point this out lol. The fact he succeeded in spite of his flaws tells you he must have serious power. It certainly wasn't his fancy footwork, defense, or ring IQ that won him the title.