Max Baer vs Jersey Joe Walcott, prime for prime 15 rounds.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Richard M Murrieta, Feb 19, 2021.

  1. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    It does, both were incredibly inconsistent.

    Braddock wasn't better than Walcott. Baer beat Max Schmeling who was arguably better HW than Charles.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef and mr. magoo like this.
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    52,256
    Likes Received:
    27,796
    Schmeling was a true all time great and Baer’s win over him was huge. Was Schmeling better than Ezzard Charles ? I’m hesitant to agree with that but I guess people could debate over that one forever.
     
  3. CANNONBALL

    CANNONBALL Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,667
    Likes Received:
    794
    yes, i think the Cooper from the Moorer, Coffee, Mercer fight has an excellent chance of beating Maxie.

    Fighters like Bowe and Holyfield - good, coordinated, combination punchers with every punch in their arsenal handled Bert easily enough but Baer had none of those skills.......and Max lost to worse fighters than Cooper. That said, i also concede Cooper lost to worst fighters than Baer. I just dont see why people rave about Baer - his skills were poor, his motivation often lacking and shockingly lost/meekly surrendered his title to one of the weakest HW champions in history in Braddock
     
  4. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    Nobody raves about Baer, picking him over Cooper isn't raving.
     
  5. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    5,037
    Likes Received:
    4,971
    Excellent assessment.
     
    apollack likes this.
  6. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    5,037
    Likes Received:
    4,971
    That isn't what Louis said on national TV nor in his autobiography.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  7. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    5,037
    Likes Received:
    4,971
    He might but Walcott handled a lot of punchers rather well.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  8. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2009
    Messages:
    5,065
    Likes Received:
    6,949
    I might rank Baer higher overall, but, head to head, there's that styles thing again. Walcott would probably take a decision win over Max, but I wouldn't bet on it. Baer was a crazy fighter when motivated.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  9. CANNONBALL

    CANNONBALL Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,667
    Likes Received:
    794
    i dont think its inconceivable to suggest a fighter with no jab, left hook, head movement or defence - as Baer was - could lose to a faster, more explosive, two handed puncher with better skills
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  10. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    I agree, but Baer had left hook and I don't find Cooper faster, more explosive or more skilled at all. Baer was unorthodox and wasn't super skilled of course, but he wasn't clueless. You also ignore significant physical advantages Baer has over Bert.
     
  11. Devon

    Devon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,682
    Likes Received:
    7,042
    Walcott would be too mobile, too fast, he would be jabbing and moving and Baer would be too straight up, and Walcott would be constantly moving or slipping after he jabs and changing his exit point, and Baer never did any of that stuff, he would be eating jabs all night long like in the Braddock fight except Walcott is better
     
  12. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    27,676
    Likes Received:
    7,669
    Jersey Joe qualifies because his minimum number of A-game fights is still more than a lot of other great fighters.

    guys like Walcott were always talented. It was always there. They had wilderness years…but preserved greatness throughout.

    guys like James Toney and Roberto Duran spring to mind.

    when the stars lined up for them these guys were special almost at any point. And overall, they all have enough good nights to qualify
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2022
  13. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    27,676
    Likes Received:
    7,669
    Max Schmeling?
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    52,256
    Likes Received:
    27,796
    I don’t rate Schmeling as high as Charles
     
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    27,676
    Likes Received:
    7,669
    at heavyweight they are as close to being about as good as each other though.