...and like I just said in my post, BOTH Floyd and pac did things during those negotiations which hindered the fight being made both means two people
floyd repeats history. pac fights anyone and is not afraid to lose unlike floyd who ducks fighters to protect his 0. pacs doesnt need floyd as much as floyd needs pac.
you're not reading what people are telling you you're just recycling what you've always said you like pac - we get it. but that's not an excuse to lose objectivity
floyd is a cherry picking fool fact. no objectivity in that. pacs resume is better than floyds. another fact. no objectivity in that you *****s love to discredit pac when floyd discredits himself daily. pac is just another great fighter who was in his prime who floyd ducked just as he has done in the past
if I was a '*****', I wouldn't be blaming both him and pac for the fight not being made, would I? but all you're doing is canning Floyd because you love pacman... you have no chance of seeing things how they really are until you take him off that pedestal you keep putting him on
show me where I said "pac aint ****" - on any post above, or any post I've ever posted on this forum? you're getting over-defensive to protect your hero - but the only 'threat' to him are the ones you're inventing in your head right now
"you have no chance of seeing things how they really are until you take him off that pedestal you keep putting him on" your words:hi: