None of that would make the general consensus to be flipped. What does this post even mean? Like nobody here ever drinks while watching a fight? Get real. I was giving my opinion.
We know computer box only works when it favors Floyd bring up compu box for the Castillo fight all of a sudden compu box is not credible
That's not a part of their agenda... I mean scoring criteria. Besides the fact Pac's own trainer admits defeat in the bout. But let's not let that deter this nation of imbeciles. I enjoy them for entertainment value. Their desperation is comical.
what is ring generalship if the person supposedly employing it better than the other is getting hit and hurt more... zero ring generalship thats what
Ring generalship can be whatever you want it to be as long as it justifies your scorecard, even if that is not true, it is. You see Pac blocking a jab and countering with a clean punch in slow motion, but I'm regular speed they see Mayweather controlling the range. Neither is wrong in that sense but some one could be.
It's ****ing sad that grown men can't let this go , 118-110 pac won 2 rounds the 4th and 6th that's it deal with it he was easy work.
**** the press scores the official score is 118-110 and it was correct , better question is if Money beats Pac again what's going to be the excuse then?
Ortiz gave a better fight than Pacman. Even , Berto landed more punches. 10-2, All major boxing publications and fans had Floyd winning comfortably. Some don't even like Floyd. Facts.
and the clincher is that closer and more thorough examination of the fight through slomo of raw video evidence sides with the press scores.. "correct" depends on accuracy of observation.. naked eye at real time isnt as accurate as slowmo video replay