Mayweather vs Pacquiao - PPV comparison question

Cool. Oscar, Richard, and Al are still going to use the Oscar fight in negotiations.:good

 

$54.95 for the HD.

 

Typical ******* BS.

Floyd's #s and Manny's #s are NOT equal, Genius.

Mayweather Cotto did $94 million in revenue - @ least $20 million MORE than Pacquiao's highest grossing PPV.

Floyd is the DRAW and deserves the bigger purse. Period, end of story.

 

cheaper than Pac-Marquez.

 

Well then, give me their last three fight ppv sales then.. Because they are almost identical..

You obviously dont understand current market value.. It doesn't matter what you paid for your car three years ago.. It matters what it's worth today..

The only fair comparison is the last year, or two years max.. But that wouldn't fit your agenda, would it?

 

At the time, that was the going rate for PPV, in 2009.

In 2011 it was $59,95 for the HD and $54.95 for the non hd.

 

You can't just pick fights man..Thats like me saying, well give me there last 5 fights.

Your picking a number.

THE ONLY FAIR COMPARISON IS COMMON OPPONENTS. There are FIVE of them.:good

 

Your trolling now.. Common sense man...

Everyone knows what matters is current value..

You had an agenda and when questioned you back track...

Give me their last two years of ppv sales... With a changing market all that matters is today.. So, it's time to close your common opponent argument.. It's weak and only a fool falls for that...

 

Nope...yours is weak and subjective...your just picking a number out of your ass..

So again, common opponents is the best way. In common opponents, I'm not just picking a number out of my ass.:good

 

Even if you use their most recent official numbers for Floyd v Mosley, Cotto, Marquez and Pac's most recent of Margarito, Clottey, Cotto Mayweather still does the larger numbers by a wide margin.

 

and if you want current value here you go.

Pac made $25,000,000 for his last fight while Floyd made $50,000,000 for his last fight.

Pac Marquez 3 brought in $74,000,000 in revenue while Mayweather Cotto brought in $94,000,000.

You don't get it..I'm talking about what Oscar, Al, and Richard will use in negotaitions. They will use common opponents so as not to bicker back and forth between which fights should be used.

So for the 3rd time..they have 5 common opponents...

Oscar
Ricky
Juan
Shane
Miguel

Just because you don't like that Floyd puts Pacquiao to shame in revenue, $$$ made, and PPV buys is not important. What is important is that this is the ONLY way to objectively pick which fights count, if they end up sending this to a 3rd party accounting firm.

 

Your argument is still weak.. And you wanna bring up individual purses, when the big picture is what golden boy and top rank split dummy..

Common opponents will be a small part as well as who had sold more throughout their entire careers..

It boils down to recent fights.. They will go back two years, three max...

Ppv numbers are damn near equal in this day and age we are in... You can hang on to the past all you want, but thats all it is...

Recent fights they are equal... All that matters..

 

the amount of people that buy ppv may be similar but the fact is that Mayweather fights make FAR more money than pac fights.

 

nope not equal at all.

And again, your PICKING 2-3 years. That's stupid.

also, $94,000,000 in revenue with Cotto while Manny did $74,000,000 in revenue with Marquez. That's $20,000,000.

Your just picking a number, like I said before. Why can't it just be for the last 2 fights then, lets make it 4 fights, no 3 fights.

With common opponents, there holds no bias.:deal

 

If you look at everything since they both fought Oscar, then Floyd murders him there to.

But *******s don't want to do that because it exposes their weak 50/50 stance.

I'm also talking about the most fair and unbias way, which is how the promoters will do it. I'm not talking about what I think, or what *******S think..I'm talking about how the promoters will actually engage, with this info, in negotiations.

Arum won't allow them to go back to Oscar for a timeline because that would kill Pacquiao weak leg of a 50/50. Oscar won't allow Arum to just use fights going back to 2009 because you leave out 2 common opponents. So they'll end up going off of common opponents as it holds no bias.