Michael katsidis

What , have you got against Mick

 

I believe Katsidis would give Brook a dam good fight

 

I dont understand why some of these fighters, that do it tough to make a good quid, dont put a bit away, say enough to buy a house or 2, then turn their brains off, and pull a $600 to $700 week job say in a factory. If you were smart thats more than enough cash to get by if you dont have a mortgage. But, their EGOs dont allow them to do it.

 

If you think Mick has a chance against Khan at this stage in their careers YDKSAB

 

Man some people have no idea, Brook is a Welterweight, if Kats couldn't beat Ricky Burns at lightweight he will get annihilated and stopped by Brook at 147.

 

Brook would KO Katsidis easy!

 

Fighting Stephen Foster of UK.
won 31 (KO 18) + lost 4 (KO 1) + drawn 1 = 36

 

@MidniteProwler thinking Buster who said Amir Khan and the other guy who said Kel Brook were serious.

 

some of its ego but most of its the addiction of the sport, its a very hard sport to walk away from if you enjoy what you are doing. some people have one fight and never fight again while others just dont know when to say no, its not the brains, its just that this sport isn't for everyone, some people dont like the reality of being hit, others don't mind getting hit and love the rush they get when winning a fight. It gives some people a purpose in life which without they feel lost. If these guys spent the same amount of time in a paying job as they do training running, fighting they would have quiet a bit of money to show for it, but sadly the sport isn't all about the money, thus its been called a poor mans sport. If your in the sport for the money then your in it for the wrong reasons imo. The money comes if and only if you are one of the small minority of boxers who are blessed with a natural ability to fight and entertain. Mayweather is one rare example.

 

They were serious kid

Seriously when it comes to this boxing **** I school you noobs

 

Brook is a solid welterweight , Brook v Kasidas = A lot of pain possible some serious brain damage for Kasidas ..

Then again maybee the guy calling for it is one of the , people around who have been on the recieving end of Kasidas when he was younger and stupider , and thinks it would be KARMA

 

You dont half speak some shite !

 

I wonder if he will be able to pull the trigger again.

 

What parts shite mate , You his best mate or something , Mick in his best days would'nt of beat Brooks , Kell is a ****ing welterweight you dim wit , Mick at his best was a lightweight , granted a strong lightweight but limited in skills has well has being smaller . Lets not get too carried away here about the great Kasidas beacause he's an Aussie , Facts are whenever he stepped up HE LOST , and he got a belting ,

If guts and determination won world titles , he would be multiple world champ now . BUT THEY DON'T , and he is now showing signs of some serous damage .

Kell Brooks would be too big and HURT HIM . , learn a bit first before you go on public forums making a **** of yourself ,

 

before mouthing off like a hero, just remember the most supposed fight outcomes don't always pan out.

remember mijares was suppose to make darchinyan look like an amateur and would pick vic off with ease. vic was expected to lose every round, but instead he bashed mijares senseless round after round.

remember green wasn't going to land one punch on jones jnr for a whole 12 rounds. jones was supposedly going to make danny look foolish. that didn't pan out did it?

fwiw, I don't know if mick would beat kell or not, I haven't seen him much before.