Micky Duff or Frank Warren

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by colinthfc, May 4, 2009.

  1. colinthfc

    colinthfc Guest

    Who will have the best legacy in British boxing?
     
  2. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    38,034
    Likes Received:
    93
  3. mugen82

    mugen82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    3,483
    Likes Received:
    0
    Warren for definites, if u can get Gary Lockett and Michael Jennings big fights in america against pound for pound ranked fighters, You've gotta be doing something right. Blindsiding GoldenBoy by stealing the Kotelnik fight from Victor Ortiz fight for Khan is another stroke of genius! Say what u like about his fraudulent matchmaking and bitterness against anybody who doesnt join his party etc but he does manage to build great records for poor fighters, before getting them a massive payday.

    Plus he straight up ended Mickey Duffs career worse than Pacquiao did Hattons.
     
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    25,495
    Likes Received:
    2,178
    Duff was brilliant in the 60s, 70s and 80s; Warren 90s and 00s.

    I give the edge to Frank because (believe it or not) he had to compete against must stiffer competition; Duff (Astaire and Levine) had it easy, with his/their monopoly and because of the lack of Internet, less aware fancy.
     
  5. fatcity

    fatcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    17,931
    Likes Received:
    11
    Warren is much more clever.Duff was a monopoliser and a thug.
     
  6. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    86,106
    Likes Received:
    4,098
    Duff probably, but it's hard to say.