Mike McCallum vs Tery Norris

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by AlFrancis, Sep 4, 2009.

  1. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    9,813
    Likes Received:
    848
    Mike McCallum vs Terry Norris prime for prime at jnr middleweight. How does this one go?
     
  2. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    38,042
    Likes Received:
    7,584
    Good matchup..I think McCallum would outsmart him and win a decision. A knockdown for Mike would happen, and it's even possible that there would be a late tko for McCallum.
     
  3. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    Messages:
    21,677
    Likes Received:
    52
    i rate norris as the most talented and possibly greatest 154 pounder of all time. but in this case, i think mccallum's chin holds well under norris' shots but i can't say the same of terry. mccallum loses the first few rounds due to norris' activity and incredible combination punching but slowly begins to walk through his shots and wear him down with a consistent, as always, body attack. by the 10th the fight is close on the cards but mccallum has taken the reigns and is walking norris down. it's dead even going into the 12th but a flash knockdown seals the deal and gives mccallum the UD
     
  4. Dave's Top Ten

    Dave's Top Ten Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,188
    Likes Received:
    35
    Norris is quicker, more mobile, better puncher.
    Norris boxes to a UD.
     
  5. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,931
    Likes Received:
    82
    Terry the speedster would be very troublesome, but over time I see McCallum slowly grinding him down via body attack. Mike by UD....or maybe late TKO.
     
  6. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    36,580
    Likes Received:
    21,309
    Mike is a level above Terry. Norris certainly has his him some areas but overall McCallum is the more proven and skilled operator.

    I think the fight goes much like the McCrory one. Terry takes some early rounds and gives Mike a hard fight but eventually starts getting caught with to much leather and gets steamrolled later.
     
  7. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    11,935
    Likes Received:
    100
    Pretty much the way I see it, from top to bottom.
     
  8. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    14,678
    Likes Received:
    186
    McCallum takes the second half of the fight to win a ud or as has been said a late tko
     
  9. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    5,641
    Likes Received:
    735
    Mike via stoppage, probably 7 or 8.
     
  10. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    5,581
    Likes Received:
    85
    Could be similar to McCallum - Curry. Norris could take a lot of rounds with superior physical attributes but McCallum's steady, determined, solid technical approach would eventually catch up to Norris. McCallum tko 11.
     
  11. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    13,968
    Likes Received:
    70
    easy - McCallum by TKO.
    Norris' chin + McCallum's ability at 154 = McCallum TKO Norris.
    the harder question is : how much rounds.
    We have Julian Jackson as a measurement tool.
    also Donald Curry : McCallum KO'd a younger version at 5.
    for Norris it took 8 to KO an older one.
    Also Norris was stopped 4 times as a pro and lost 9 , retiring at 31 and only 3 times at the end of his career fighting slightly above 154 , 2 times of them against nobodies.
    McCallum traveled to 175 , and to times above.
    never stopped as a pro , had 5 losses.
    McCallum is clearly better by far it is insulting.
     
  12. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    9,813
    Likes Received:
    848
    Well I wasn't trying to insult anyone. I would go for McCallum by KO myself, could happen at any point.
    I was just wondering how many would go for Norris.
     
  13. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    36,580
    Likes Received:
    21,309

    Dont reply to him Al..he might go away then.
     
  14. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    9,813
    Likes Received:
    848

    :yep:yep
     
  15. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    10,066
    McCallum would win because Norris' chin would not last against a fighter of Mike's talent. Mike's own chin was granite. It could be a terrific battle but once hurt Norris would have to fight for survival and that would not be enough.