Most dominant compubox stats

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bballchump11, Jan 14, 2012.


Page 12 of 12
  1. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    18,163
    2
    May 24, 2006
    compubox again?

    Here is one thing!


    It either tells you how featherfisted one fighter is or how good his pitterpunches are!

    Mike Tyson - 20 punch- 1 KO. Lousy!
     
    pejevan, Jul 18, 2012
    pejevan, Jul 18, 2012
    #166
  2. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    ***** hypocrisy strong in this thread.
     
    puga_ni_nana, Jul 18, 2012
    puga_ni_nana, Jul 18, 2012
    #167
  3. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    because I'm curious and other ppl are curious too about the most dominant numbers :huh

    can you not understand or do I need to speak baboon to you?
     
    bballchump11, Jul 18, 2012
    bballchump11, Jul 18, 2012
    #168
  4. randy brown

    randy brown $$$ Full Member

    1,866
    0
    Oct 28, 2011
    money is king of efficiency. if anything, compubox only highlights how great money is and how high he is above the competition.

    pac who? khan who? sergio who? 43 and 0 baby.
     
    randy brown, Jul 18, 2012
    randy brown, Jul 18, 2012
    #169
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007

    yeah and you also said that compubox doesn't mean ****. so why talk about a **** system in the first place if it's flawed?
     
    puga_ni_nana, Jul 19, 2012
    puga_ni_nana, Jul 19, 2012
    #170
  6. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    If you ask the same question over and over, you'll get the same answer
     
    bballchump11, Jul 19, 2012
    bballchump11, Jul 19, 2012
    #171
  7. kimonerz

    kimonerz Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,052
    0
    Apr 1, 2007
    You'll always see mayweather in this!
     
    kimonerz, Jul 19, 2012
    kimonerz, Jul 19, 2012
    #172
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so is compubox **** and inaccurate according to you? YES or NO?
     
    puga_ni_nana, Jul 20, 2012
    puga_ni_nana, Jul 20, 2012
    #173
  9. Hattons Hook

    Hattons Hook Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,783
    10
    Nov 15, 2009
    Calzaghe 351 of 952 vs Lacy 116 of 444, not bad.
     
    Hattons Hook, Jul 20, 2012
    Hattons Hook, Jul 20, 2012
    #174
  10. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    most of the time, yes. It also sucks in evaluating who won a fight or certain rounds.

    It's the same thing when people say your 40 time in football is a shitty way to measure how fast a football player really is, but people still look at them and get impressed and want to see who the fastest times are
     
    bballchump11, Jul 20, 2012
    bballchump11, Jul 20, 2012
    #175
  11. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so give us an instance where compubox is not **** or accurate? floyd-gatti? floyd-marquez?
     
    puga_ni_nana, Jul 20, 2012
    puga_ni_nana, Jul 20, 2012
    #176
  12. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    When measuring a fighter's workrate a lot of times and I thought this fight looked pretty accurate

    This content is protected
     
    bballchump11, Jul 20, 2012
    bballchump11, Jul 20, 2012
    #177
  13. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    James Toney 401/616 65%

    Iran Barkley 153/667 23%

    this is through 9 rounds
     
    bballchump11, Jul 23, 2012
    bballchump11, Jul 23, 2012
    #178
Page 12 of 12