Most overrated HW of all time.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Lostmykeys, Jul 1, 2007.


  1. enquirer

    enquirer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,206
    26
    Mar 18, 2006
    I think marciano is a very unusual to rank as he had very good attributes of power,stamina,heart,was probably very awkward to fight and beat all the men put in front of him....However his opposition cannot be said to be stellar/prime or against big men so his resume is lacking and how he would do against the big atg heavies is somewhat unknown....Did he ever beat a big world class heavyweight contendor? Im talking 6 ft 3 225 and athletic? Its hard to say as he seemed an extremely determined and awkward guy and sometimes that can make all the difference....Any modern heavy that fought marciano would be fighting a style that they probably would never have faced before. Marciano could also have added a bit more functional weight with some weight training/advanced nutrition.....If frazier can be successful at 5ft 11 and 205 then maybe marciano can,rocky was more two fisted than frazier....
     
  2. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    Your description, 6' 3" and 225 lbs and very athletic--I would point out that no one at all defeated anyone who really fits this bill prior to the 1970's. The only one who might come close to such a discription is Jeffries, and only Johnson beat him when he was washed up. This amounts to saying that modern heavys have grown larger and so we should dismiss all old-timers. There is not much point in studying the history of the sport then.
    Joe Louis, whom Marciano did defeat as an old man, was, in my judgement, the best big heavy (over 200 lbs) prior to Ali.
    By the way, why not dismiss Ali by pointing out he never defeated anyone at least 6' 5" and over 240 lbs at all, let alone someone very athletic, such as Lewis or Wlad Klitschko?
     
  3. enquirer

    enquirer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,206
    26
    Mar 18, 2006
    Ok,i will clarify my point a little more. Even 6ft 3 and 210 of athletic muscle would be fine...
    Ali did beat athletic guys of this range such as terrell,williams,foreman etc....When we get to 6 ft 5 and 240 there arent that many athletic guys,maybe lewis,bowe and a few others....I wouldnt even mind if we had seen marciano against a 6ft plus 210 powerhouse like liston....My point being its hard to tell if the rock could hang with these types of athletic big guys....Maybe some knowledgable posters could discuss the size and athleticism of marcianos opponents?
    Finally,if you say that heavies pre 70s did not defeat athletic guys of this size than i will say that does make comparison somewhat hard between eras,it doesnt mean i am dismissing old timers,the films can show us who could box well,with ali he was big and athletic enough to beat bigger guys than himself,and i think this is quite obvious and proven....
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,685
    29,006
    Jun 2, 2006
    I dont think its only your keys you lost.
     
  5. torchkit

    torchkit New Member Full Member

    68
    1
    Jan 21, 2007
    Most over rated of all time? Simple: Ali
     
  6. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,180
    15,179
    Jun 9, 2007
    1 Lennox Lewis
    2 Lennox Lewis
    3 Lennox Lewis
    4 Lennox Lewis
    5 Lennox Lewis
     
  7. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    Overated? Marciano, his lack of top class opponents isn't his fault but its still a fact.
     
  8. hdog

    hdog Member Full Member

    473
    123
    Jun 12, 2005
    look at marciano's footwork when he knocked out walcott, sweet. when he stopped lastarza he hit him with a left then ducked, adjusted his feet and put him through the ropes with a right. beautiful.

    he also could make himself a smaller target and had very good upper body movement although i think it wasn't quite as good at the end due to his back.
     
  9. Illmatic

    Illmatic Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,062
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    how is Jack Dempsey not being discussed? he is CLEARLY the most overrated heavy champ....he was popular, but did little to earn that popularity.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,141
    45,428
    Feb 11, 2005
    I mentioned him earlier. I also mentioned Jack Johnson and Ali. If I were to pick between the three, it would have to be Johnson. Unless you have one of those Marciano fanatics around.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,528
    27,117
    Feb 15, 2006
    Seems a bit harsh.

    He beat two fighters generaly regarded as top 20 all time heavyweights in Walcott and Charles.

    Heb eat two pound for pound greats in Charles and Moore.

    Louis might have been old but he would probably still have beaten anybody else outside Walcott and Charles at this point in time.

    How many heavyweights can boast a similar level of competition?
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,528
    27,117
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that he is generaly under rated.

    Especialy head to head.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,819
    47,709
    Mar 21, 2007
    This thread is crap.

    I say that as one of those nominated by ESB as top boxing analayst.

    :lol:
     
  14. Dostoevsky

    Dostoevsky Hardcore......to the max! Full Member

    5,691
    6
    Jun 17, 2007
    Completley agree.
    If it wasn't for the Tyson fight no one would even be talking about him in terms of the heavyweights.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,819
    47,709
    Mar 21, 2007
    Given that he was a four times belt holder who fought absolutley everyone he was supposed to without ducking, that seems unlikley.