Irrelevance. He dosn't have a better win than Pacman. Horn also has a higher boxing IQ and is harder to beat than Lemiuex. Saunders made Lamiuz look like Jeff Lacy What about 180?. I already disproved that.
No it is relevant you ****ing cretin...1 victory over an aged ATG does not equate to a better resume compared with one with numerous solid victories. If that was the case then Quillin beat an aged Winky Wright....therefore a better victory than anything that Matthysse has done wouldn't you agree? And Crawford beat Horn far easier....all of a sudden Horn is a quality operator.....weakest champ at 147.
It means going into the Crawford fight , Horn was a better opponent than Lemieux going into the Golovkin fight. Therefore Horn is a better win. Manny Pacquiao was ranked on the Ring top 10 list , was a champion had just beat possible hall of famer Tim Bradely and beat top 10 ranked Vargas Winky was unranked coming off 3 losses and hadn't beaten a top 10 ranked opponent in 8 years. Its just one fail after another isn't it?
Castillo 1 Maidana 1 Ortiz DQ for hitting when him while unprotected Cortez NEVER said box on Judah DQ for Roger jumping in ring & attacking Judah Also May/Pac should have been made a N/C ay least Reverse the roles on last 3 & this is how they;d have been judged
I know what Winky was doing hence in my initial post saying I wasn't going to add him. So are you saying that Horns 1 good victory equates to a better fighter over a more solid resume in Lemieux? Also I notice you have veered away from Jacobs/Matthysse and Craaford/180.... Trying to now role with bashing Lemieux.
People thought Horn would beat Crawford. Nobody thought Lamiux would beat GGG. Beating Horn is worth more since he was on a better run going into the fight.
No body thought Horn would beat Crawford.....nobody.... So are you saying 1 victory is better than an overall solid resume beating the better fighters who may have not been champions? Also I notice you have veered away from Jacobs/Matthysse and Crawford/180.
So what is it you are saying? You are currently destroying your own initial argument. I'm glad you clicked on, this is like talking to that imbecile shockmaster
Flashy isn't the word. He landed cleaner and harder punches. The fight went closer to his plan than GGG's.
Yet he threw and landed less and he was on the back foot throughout. Easy win for Golovkin, just corrupt USA judges as usual.
The weird thing is that Pacquiao's year prior to losing to Horn featured two victories that were better than anything Lemieux produced in his whole career. Horn also fought difficult fights from the start so I'm not sure where this one hit wonder talk comes from....He just didn't lose half of them like David.