Most underrated chins in boxing history

Dafuq? U guys in classic section have always looked down on me bcuz of my youth and I am always respectful and polite but i get this altitude from u and you just laugh at me and dismiss the truth of what im saying at best. u dont call me names and stuff and i appreshate that but its this thing where i got nothing of substance 2 say that bother me. That im wrong just bcuz i watched it and thought about it later on. But lots of u guys didnt like see sullivan first hand urselves either but talk about him and still enjoy a sybil discussion on it. Why not xtend the same curtesy to me 2?

 

I do apologize for interfering in your post, I will never do that again to you.

 

These are pantsiff aggressive likes, guys. We better than that.

 

Wlad Klitschko is the big one for me. Mayweather's chin also gets a bit underrated.

Going back a tad I feel Ken Norton's chin often gets unfairly disparaged.

 

Sorry I responded. Thought we were having a discussion. Next time if I do anything it will just be ‘yep’ and move along.

 

We were having a discussion but it sounded as if you were annoyed at my response, I do not like to annoy friends.

 

Loll

According to your "logic" because Camacho stopped a 41 washed up Leonard and Hearns couldn't stop much fresher versions of Leonaed Hearns's power should be questioned.

This is one of the dumbest posts I've seen in awhile.

Please tell me this is a troll post on your part

 

Your saying some hurtful things about Hector Camacho. Its hurting me emotionally with these vicious attacks. I can take it. I can take it.

There is book that has just been released. A biography of Hector Camacho. Last week.

 

Accordion to my logic? It's just the truth. How old was Leonard for the second Hearns fight when Hearns wasn't draining himself and still couldn't even put him away? Bro...you gotta drop this bias and the childish behaveyour saying people are trolls because they know more than you about boxing. I'm so tired of this. I try to be a good person and get nothing but crapped on, on this board. Camacho was a great fighter. He's like the best guy Chavez beat and everyone seem to think Chavez is one of the greatest all time. Well then how that be? How that when who he foughted?

Aww...hims lost his conferdence? Aww...Lyle sure didn't benefit from it.

 

Lol.

The Leonard/Camacho fight was two names way past it in a meaningless (in the big picture) fight.

Hearns hit much harder than Camacho

Leonard was a shot 41 year old who had not fought in 6 years when he faced Camacho and looked done in his previous fight against Norris.

Hearns fought an absolutely peak Leonard in 1981 and a Leonard at the end of his prime in 1989. The war with Hearns in 1989 likely took a lot out of him. He looked good against Hagler in 1987 and against Lalonde in 1988.

Age and inactivity meant he was an empty shell when he fought Camacho in 1997.

I didn't mean to denigrate you but if you can't see the logical fallacy in your argument I am confident many others will.

 

Oh dear.

 

Nah, we’re good. Sorry if I made you feel that way.

 

I love that Ears can still snare even the long standers on here, it genuinely helps my life. He's probably gotten me in fairness as Rhas Al gooly gooly ganggang.

 

Norton
Bruno
Shavers
Whitaker
Judah
Broner

 

Chucho Castillo