its a loud laugh, don't you try and twist it into anything that you do in real life. I'm not you, you psycho, you keep punching your mums sofa or whatever. you are quite mad. hide had virtually none of the attributes of ali.
Yeah, he got kayo'd wonce in a kick boxing match. So what? does that erase all of his accomplishments? Lennox Lewis is a nobody because McCall got him that time? Damn your a hater.:roll: His KO of hide was actually a clash of heads. Is that the point you are making? Its not as if he wasnt kicking Hides azz anyway. It must really take a lot of work to throw s.hit on a resume like that. Nobody has ever come close to doing anything like this, yet you downplay and call him a bumatsch What does that make Lewis or Tyson? Sure, they had better boxing resumes, but obviously Vitali has accomplished more in sports and life than any heavyweight EVER:deal
dan don't reply to people who have you on ignore, because if you do, you look to them like a goldfish opening and closing your mouth noiselessly blublbublub
In your eyes the number 1 ATG, with almost every attribute maxxed out in boxing, undisputed for close to a decade in total years, who beat a score of ATGs and HoFers, is the same as a bit part temporary titlist with a **** chin. that's ok, its your eyes, not a matter of concern for everyone.
Problem is, the HOFers Ali beat were only HOFers because they fought him and gave him a good fight. The Ali illusion. If he was as amazing as everyone makes out he wouldn't have relied on so many gift decisions, been beaten and knocked down so many times. Ali was a good fighter but not as good as people like you like to make him out to be. Deal with it. I prefer my eyes without rose tinted specs in front of them.
lets test your theory. archie moore - was he famous because he fought ali? no. he was famous for what he did before ali. to claim he became famous for facing ali is terminally stupid, its clearly the other way round. Floyd patts - famous simply for fighting ali? NO, famous for setting historical record as youngest undisputed hw champ. frazier? no gained his status for unifying plus Olympic gold plus excellent defence run AND plus beating the last undisputed champ ali amongst all the other world champs. foreman ? no, not losing to ali (which would be stupid, claiming atg/hof status for LOSING a fight, if that's what you mean then perhaps you mean that in a klit**** sense? no geroge is famous for his crushing Olympics, undisputed title and defence run plus an awesome aged comeback, again a historical precedent. Liston? for losing twice to Ali? NO, no one gets in a HoF for getting beat. that's not a claim, its what he did before that the counts. Bob Foster? - no hes not famous because he fought ali - hes famous for being one of the best LHWs in history, arguably the best. Unless you think that LHW means nothing of course. I expect you mean JUST Norton, who is clearly a backdoor hofer, getting in for BEATING Ali, NOT for losing to him as you defined earlier - so you CATEGORICALLY CANNOT MEAN NORTON. Or you mean perhaps Leon spinks, who isn't really HoF for beating a parkinsons affected ali, is he? Very backdoor. Obviously. this is a well established fact already. So is Leon SPinks alone the basis of your argument? everyone already knows he was an easy route for aged, already diseased ali. What a joke of an argument you are trying to advance, about Ali who at that point shouldn't have been a titlist due to his medical problems, over someone who isn't even strictly HoF and had done nothing. Thats your argument? you lose. you shoulda gone to specsavers. Not just a bit - clearly and blatantly as shown above.
muhammad ali made a career out of fighting guys that weren't even six feet tall. vitali by comfortable decision.
lets test this klittaard theory too, see if it gets totally exposed like the last one. First lets consider alis record up to becoming champ - sonny banks 6 ft 2 don warner 6 ft 1 George logan 6 ft 1 billy daniels 6 ft 4 alexajandro lavaronte 6 ft 3+1/2 archie moor 5ft 11 (understandable since he was an old LHW moving up) Charlie powell 6ft 4 doug jones 6 ft cooper 6 ft liston 6 ft (besides being one of the most feared men of all time - so you'd hardly call him shorty to his face) ok klittaard so far totally exposed since they are all over 6 feet except for the LHW guy. but I'm not finished, next we look at Alis 1st defence run so as to expose further the klittaard who said, and I quote, this - I'll be back to finish the post with the rest of alis career...
yeah i'm sure you just debunked my claim by posting some bogus measurements from boxrec. you even went on to leave out their weights to make face. not to mention you left all the mdigets he fought out of the discussions as well, like joe frazier and floyd patterson who are supposedly two of his best wins.
meanwhile vitali outboxing a 250lb giant lennox lewis and routinely destroying 240lbers near the end of his career at or around age 40
I left out the weights?? NO you didn't involve the weights Your ENTIRE quote with no mention of weight, is - "muhammad ali made a career out of fighting guys that weren't even six feet tall. vitali by comfortable decision" - and now YOU are trying to save face by lying that I left them out, when you did the deed in reality. A double Lie from you. yep I actually did post to directly contradict your height claim, which was your only claim alone. And not aonly did I contradict it, but proved it 99.9% false so far up to alis title win. DO you want to go further than the title win? Your claim has been weighed, measured, checked and found wanting. SO far, you have actually been found to have been lying entirely- and still trying to back up your lie instead of admitting to it. Or do you want to try again with a different claim? go ahead.